The proprietor of two Pekin geese attacked by a canine in 2018, ensuing within the dying of 1, has had a prices award tossed out by the Court of Appeal, after his long-running battle for justice. Photo / 123rf
A story of two home geese named Drakie and Duckie has had neighbours in a small Southland city in a flap that’s gone all the way in which to the Court of Appeal.
It all started on August 19, 2018, when the 2 Pekin geese had been “freely and happily wandering together”. The home geese often loved the pond on proprietor Eugene Greendrake’s rural property within the Nightcaps, inhabitants 1500, simply down the highway from Tinkertown.
But, on this event, they had been on the entrance of a part of neighbour Wayne McConnochie’s farm.
It was there the geese had been attacked by a canine and suffered vital accidents. Drakie was discovered lifeless within the close by stormwater creek shortly afterwards. Duckie was discovered the subsequent morning, nonetheless alive however very weak.
Advertisement
She recovered after 12 days of veterinary help.
Greendrake took a non-public prosecution in opposition to McConnochie underneath a piece of the Dog Control Act and the Animal Welfare Act, arguing he was accountable for the attack on his pets Drakie and Duckie.
A one-day trial adopted in September 2021, at which the choose declined an software to dismiss the fees however held that the weather of each expenses weren’t made out and there was vital doubt about whether or not McConnochie was the proprietor of the canine in query.
Greendrake utilized for depart to enchantment on a query of legislation.
Advertisement
In June 2022, the High Court declined the applying, largely as a result of the proposed grounds of enchantment “had no merit”.
A prices award of $10,000 in opposition to Greendrake adopted for the failed prosecution within the District Court.
The choose mentioned he couldn’t go so far as discovering an absence of excellent religion in bringing the proceedings however thought of Greendrake “took a somewhat blinkered approach” to the prosecution.
He mentioned as a result of no different company was ready to prosecute, that ought to have indicated the possible prospects of success.
The choose additionally known as into query the presentation, reminiscence, age, infirmity, and well being problems with Greendrake’s eyewitness.
“It should have been obvious to Mr Greendrake from the outset that his case would not reach the evidential threshold required.”
He didn’t contemplate it essential to make a deterrent award of prices however thought of 40 per cent of precise prices was not unreasonable.
In August this 12 months, Greendrake’s enchantment in opposition to the District Court’s prices choice was allowed.
The choose agreed that his prosecution failed because of “significant inadequacy” within the proof on the day however held there was no foundation for exceeding the utmost scale prices.
The choose mentioned the very fact the important thing eyewitness didn’t come as much as temporary was not proof of a procedural failing.
Advertisement
In April this 12 months, prices of $4500 had been awarded in opposition to Greendrake for the failed software to the High Court for depart to enchantment. That was the main focus of a Court of Appeal choice that was launched yesterday.
The Court of Appeal has now allowed the enchantment and has quashed the High Court’s cost order.
Greendrake advised NZME he’s pleased with this latest choice, greater than with another choice because the saga began in 2018.
The Court of Appeal in the end discovered there was nothing to justify an award of prices on the applying for depart to carry the prison enchantment.
“We consider the decision to exercise the discretion to award costs for an application for leave to bring the criminal appeal was wrong,” Justices Simon Moore, Matthew Palmer and Jillian Mallon mentioned of their choice.
“Even if the discretion to award costs had been soundly exercised, there was no basis for exceeding the maximum scale costs, as the High Court found in relation to the District Court’s award of cost.”
Advertisement
Tracy Neal is a Nelson-based Open Justice reporter at NZME. She was beforehand RNZ’s regional reporter in Nelson-Marlborough and has coated common information, together with courtroom and native authorities for the Nelson Mail.
