Justice M Nagaprasanna said that the ban was not in accordance with the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, and that the committee’s composition didn’t align with the act.The judgment highlighted that round surpassed Animal Birth Control Rules, necessitating its obliteration. HC deemed the ban inconsistent with present guidelines and dominated it illegal.
“This (quashing) is not going to stop the Union govt from issuing a recent round or introducing a authorized modification after consulting related stakeholders. Not each pet proprietor is taken into account a stakeholder. Stakeholders so consulted ought to embrace organisations that certify breeds of dogs and People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (Peta) as effectively,” the choose mentioned.
“The duty of a pet proprietor goes past ethical obligation; they need to be held accountable for any therapy resulting from accidents brought on by their canine, together with a separate declare for damages. The court docket has reviewed the Dangerous Dogs Act of the UK and comparable statutes,” the choose noticed. The order might be available solely on Monday because of the lengthy vacation weekend, the choose added. The central govt had claimed the notification was issued in pursuance to Delhi HC instructions. The petitioner’s illustration was placed earlier than a 10-member technical skilled panel, the Centre mentioned.