Joseph Okpako/WireImage
The housekeeper who sued Chris Brown with claims his Caucasian Orvchake shepherd “savagely” mauled her in 2020 scored a courtroom victory Wednesday. A Los Angeles decide upheld the majority of her claims in opposition to Brown’s firm and mentioned a trial would begin subsequent month.
Brown’s lawyer had challenged six of the 9 claims filed by the housekeeper and her husband in July 2021. The protection lawyer claimed Brown’s firm, Black Pyramid, didn’t personal the canine and additional argued the lawsuit’s allegations have been both redundant or just lacked the required proof. The decide did dismiss one declare — for negligent infliction of emotional misery — saying it was duplicative of a separate negligence declare, however she upheld a subsequent declare for intentional infliction of emotional misery.
“The court has denied Black Pyramid’s request for judgment on the pleadings on most of the substantive claims Black Pyramid has challenged,” Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lisa R. Jaskol wrote in her ruling adopted Wednesday. She mentioned at this stage within the case, “the pleading under attack must be accepted as true.” She additional dominated that the housekeeper’s software for a employee’s compensation declare didn’t undercut her lawsuit as a result of her criticism doesn’t allege Black Pyramid was her employer.
The housekeeper, who’s suing as a Jane Doe, alleges in her lawsuit that she was employed by an outdoor company to carry out cleansing providers at Brown’s mansion in Tarzana, Calif., on Dec. 12, 2020. She claims she was taking out some trash to an out of doors receptacle when the canine, named Hades, pounced on her out of nowhere, “savagely biting” her face, her arms and physique.
She says the canine was “literally tearing out and ripping off large chunks of her skin from her face and her arms,” in line with the criticism. “She is screaming in terror and calling out for help, yet no one came to her assistance,” her 28-page lawsuit obtained by Rolling Stone alleges.
“As she lay there bleeding profusely, barely able to see as blood is covering her eyes, face, and body she observes defendant Brown approach her, standing over her, as he is speaking on his cell phone,” the lawsuit states. The housekeeper alleges Brown ordered his safety to seize Hades and different dogs on the property and take away them from the premises earlier than police arrived.
“Defendant Brown was essentially instructing his security team to destroy evidence and flee the scene. The plaintiff remains on the ground bleeding profusely, with large chunks of skin missing from her face, arms, and body, and fearing she is going to die. In that moment, plaintiff reasonably believed that all the occupants of the home had left her there to die,” her paperwork states. She alleges somebody drove Hades lots of of miles north, to Humboldt County, the place he was later discovered with a chip tracing again to Brown. She says the Humboldt County Sheriff’s Office Animal Shelter decided the canine was harmful, so it was euthanized.
“Plaintiffs further allege (Brown) ran an unlicensed business at the premises wherein he was engaged in the business of breeding large breed, dangerous and vicious attack dogs at his home including selling those dogs, which included Hades,” the lawsuit states.
The housekeeper’s husband, recognized as John Doe, alleges within the lawsuit that the “injuries and harms to his wife” brought on by the alleged attack led to a breakdown of their marriage. He’s suing for “loss of love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, and moral support of his wife who was nearly killed in the incident and left in a pool of her own blood by the defendants.”
Brown’s lawyer didn’t reply to a request for remark after the courtroom listening to Wednesday. When Brown answered the criticism in August 2022, he referred to as the lawsuit “frivolous” and mentioned the plaintiffs have been those at fault for “how they conducted” themselves.
In a submitting searching for a default judgment in opposition to Brown, the housekeeper and her husband allege they suffered damages topping $120 million.
The housekeeper’s sister, in the meantime, was current on the home on the time of the attack and filed a separate criticism alleging negligent infliction of emotional misery. She claims she heard the canine growling and her sister shrieking in ache. Brown responded to that lawsuit saying the sister has not standing to sue as a result of she was a “remote” bystander.
