An Uber Eats driver was hospitalised after a banned ‘preventing’ dog bit his face as he delivered its proprietor a McDonald’s.
Pit bull terrier-type canine Kyra sunk its tooth into the person’s chin, leaving blood operating off his face when he arrived at Gemma Louise Ward’s door along with her meals on May 3 2023. Gemma, 39, appeared in court and admitted having a ‘preventing’ canine; and being in control of a canine dangerously uncontrolled – inflicting harm.
Sentencing was delayed by magistrates whereas she battled to cease Kyra being put down. The supply driver arrived at Ward’s home on Seventh Avenue, Limeside. He knocked on the entrance door handy the meals over at round 7.30pm, reviews Manchester Evening News.
Gareth Hughes, prosecuting, mentioned the supply driver waited till he might see a barking canine via the entrance window. After the door was answered by Ward, the person realised the animal ‘wasn’t contained in the lounge’ and was ‘attempting to get previous.
The driver mentioned the canine was ‘barking fairly loudly’ and ‘appeared agitated’, the court docket heard. Ward was ‘attempting onerous to maintain it behind her’ however was ‘struggling’, Mr Hughes added.
The canine then squeezed previous and headed ‘instantly in direction of’ the driving force, who wasn’t positive if it was after the meals or needed to attack him. The man dropped the supply bag earlier than the animal pinned him in opposition to a fence.
Join the Daily Record’s WhatsApp community here and get the latest information despatched straight to your messages.
He mentioned he was ‘frozen in worry’ because the canine jumped up and bit his chin, leaving blood dripping onto the ground. The pet tried to chunk the person once more on the identical spot, however was unable to as he had his hand over the wound.
Ward, the court docket heard, ‘appeared reluctant to get entangled’. “I used to be screaming in ache and was anxious I used to be going to be bitten once more,” the driving force mentioned in an announcement.
“It lasted a matter of minutes, however felt like a very long time.” The canine was ultimately restrained.
Police had been known as and the driving force was handled. Mr Hughes mentioned Ward ‘appeared upset’, however did not supply to assist. The driver, who was taken to hospital, added: “It left me shocked and anxious. Why would [she] let their canine do that so somebody who was there to ship meals? I’m nonetheless getting over the incident and am struggling to sleep at evening.”
Ward pleaded responsible at a earlier listening to to possessing or having custody of a preventing canine; and to being the proprietor or person in control of a canine dangerously uncontrolled, inflicting harm.
Mr Hughes mentioned the ‘pit bull terrier-type’ canine was a banned breed and the legislation says that because it induced harm, needs to be destroyed except it’s deemed to be no danger to the general public.
Ward, the court docket heard, instructed an skilled, who concluded the pet wasn’t a hazard and might be placed on the register of exempt dogs managed by the Department for Food and Rural Affairs.
An possibility, the court docket heard, was for a ‘contingency’ destruction order which might stipulate the canine must be on a brief lead and muzzled in public. Mr Hughes mentioned the court docket wanted to determine if Ward was a ‘match and correct’ person to be allowed to maintain a canine – or if she needs to be disqualified from maintaining animals.
Magistrates adjourned the case to permit police to answer the skilled report and to make enquiries round Ward’s historical past of canine possession. Anthony Horsfall, representing Ward, mentioned officers had already had ‘ample’ time to reply.
The animal has been in kennels for the reason that incident. Chair of the bench Ibrar Ul-Haq mentioned: “Having heard all the pieces that has been mentioned, we do not have enough data relating to the canine. We have not had a response from police which might help, or in any other case.
“We’re sadly going to need to put this matter off for a couple of weeks, to provide the police time to touch upon the skilled report earlier than the court docket involves a last judgement.”
Ward was launched on bail forward of a sentencing listening to on April 22.
Don’t miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond – Sign up to our daily newsletter here.
