Wednesday, May 8, 2024
Wednesday, May 8, 2024
HomePet NewsBird NewsUKBI - C5. Birds of the broader countryside and at sea |...

UKBI – C5. Birds of the broader countryside and at sea | JNCC

Date:

Related stories

-Advertisement-spot_img
-- Advertisment --
- Advertisement -

a. Farmland birds

b. Woodland birds

c. Wetland birds

d. Seabirds

e. Wintering waterbirds

Type: State Indicator

This indicator was up to date in 2023.

Introduction 

The indicator exhibits relative modifications within the abundance of frequent native birds of farmland and woodland and of freshwater and marine habitats within the UK. Bird populations have lengthy been thought-about to supply an excellent indication of the broad state of wildlife within the UK. This is as a result of they occupy a variety of habitats and reply to environmental pressures that additionally function on different teams of wildlife. In addition, there are appreciable long-term information on traits in chicken populations, permitting for comparability between short-term and long-term modifications. Because they’re a well-studied taxonomic group, drivers of change for birds are higher understood than for another species teams, which permits interpretation of noticed modifications.

Key outcomes

 Tractor icon In 2022 the UK farmland chicken index was 60% under its 1970 worth. The decline has continued at a slower charge within the short-term; exhibiting a decline of 8%.

Tree icon In 2022 the UK woodland chicken index was 37% under its 1970 worth. In the final 5 years the index has decreased by 15%. 

Waterdrop iconIn 2022 the water and wetland chicken index was 13% decrease than in 1975. In the final 5 years the index decreased by 3%. 

water icon In 2019, the breeding seabird index within the UK was 24% decrease than in 1986, barely above the bottom degree recorded (of 31% decrease than 1986, recorded in 2013). Short time period, between 2013 and 2018, the breeding seabird index elevated by 3%.

flake icon In the winter of 2021/2022, the wintering waterbird index was 88% larger than within the winter of 1975/1976. The index peaked in 1996, and has largely declined since, falling by 9% between 2016/2017 and 2021/2022.

Figure C5aia. Breeding farmland birds within the UK, 1970 to 2022


ukbi-2023-c5aia-farmland.png


ukbi-2023-c5aib-farmland.png

Notes about Figures C5aia and Figure C5aib:

  1. The line graph exhibits the unsmoothed development (dashed line) and smoothed development (strong line) with its 95% confidence interval shaded.
  2. The bar chart exhibits the share of species inside the indicator which have elevated, decreased, or proven little change, based mostly on set thresholds of annual change.

Source: British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Figure C5bia. Breeding woodland birds within the UK, 1970 to 2022


ukbi-2023-c5bia-woodland.png


ukbi-2023-c5bib-woodland.png

Notes about Figures C5bia and Figure C5bib:

  1. The line graph exhibits the unsmoothed development (dashed line) and smoothed development (strong line) with its 95% confidence interval shaded.
  2. The bar chart exhibits the share of species inside the indicator which have elevated, decreased, or proven little change, based mostly on set thresholds of annual change.

Source: British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Figure C5cia. Breeding water and wetland birds within the UK, 1975 to 2022


ukbi-2023-c5cia-water-wetland.png


ukbi-2023-c5cib-water-wetland.png

Notes about Figures C5cia and Figure C5cib:

  1. The line graph exhibits the unsmoothed development (dashed line) and smoothed development (strong line) and its 95% confidence interval shaded.
  2. The bar chart exhibits the share of species inside the indicator which have elevated, decreased, or proven little change, based mostly on set thresholds of annual change.
  3. In Figure C5cia the decrease confidence intervals for 1994 and 1995 had been un-estimable, that is because of the excessive uncertainty across the inhabitants development for Snipe which is a scarce species. As a outcome the decrease confidence intervals on the graph abridges the 2 information factors for 1993 and 1996.

Source: British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Environment Agency; Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

Figure C5dia. Breeding seabirds within the UK, 1986 to 2019


ukbi-2023-c5dia-seabirds.png


ukbi-2023-c5dib-seabirds.png

Notes about Figures C5dia and Figure C5dib:

  1. The line graph exhibits the unsmoothed development (dashed line) with its 95% confidence interval (shaded space) – no smoothed development is available for seabirds, however this might be available in future publications.
  2. The bar chart exhibits the share of species inside the indicator which have elevated, decreased, or proven little change, based mostly on set thresholds of annual change.
  3. The breeding seabird index has not been up to date since 2021, and solely consists of information as much as and together with 2019. This follows a short hiatus in updates since 2016 when the Seabird Monitoring Programme Steering Group made the choice to place the evaluation and publication of the annual SMP report on maintain enabling workers time to be devoted to the breeding seabird census, Seabirds Count.

Source: British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Seabird Monitoring Programme (co-ordinated by Joint Nature Conservation Committee).

Figure C5eia. Wintering waterbirds within the UK, 1975/76 to 2021/22


ukbi-2023-c5eia-wintering-waterbirds.png


ukbi-2023-c5eib-wintering-waterbirds.png

Notes about Figure C5eia and Figure C5eib:

  1. The line graph exhibits the unsmoothed development (dashed line) and smoothed development (strong line).
  2. The bar chart exhibits the share of species inside the indicator which have elevated, decreased, or proven little change, based mostly on set thresholds of annual change.
  3. Based on surveys throughout winters – so 1975/76 refers back to the interval from September 1975 to March 1976.
  4. Data from wintering waterbirds monitoring schemes are based mostly largely on full counts at colonies or at wetland and coastal websites of markedly various measurement. This signifies that bootstrapping strategies can’t be utilized reliably and therefore traits for these teams are at the moment introduced with out confidence intervals.

Source: British Trust for Ornithology; Defra; Joint Nature Conservation Committee; Royal Society for the Protection of Birds; Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust.

Assessment of change in chicken populations

  Long time period Short time period Latest 12 months
Farmland birds

Deteriorating

1970–2021

Deteriorating

2016–2021

Decreased 

(2022)

Woodland birds

Deteriorating

1970–2021

Deteriorating

2016–2021

Decreased

(2022)

Wetland birds

Deteriorating

1975–2021

Deteriorating

2016–2021

No change 

(2022)

Seabirds

Not assessed

Not assessed

Not assessed

Wintering waterbirds

Improving

1975/76–2020/21

Deteriorating

2015/16–2020/21

No available information

Notes for Assessment of Change desk:

  1. Whilst latest 12 months share modifications within the indices are reported based mostly on essentially the most recent smoothed information level (2022), the formal long-term and short-term assessments of the statistical significance of those modifications are made utilizing the smoothed information to 2021. This is as a result of essentially the most recent smoothed information level (2022) is more likely to change in subsequent 12 months’s update when further information are included for 2023.
  2. Analysis of the underlying traits is undertaken by the info suppliers. Smoothed information are available for farmland, woodland, wetland and wintering waterbirds, however not for seabirds.
  3. The change evaluation for the seabirds measure has been eliminated till a approach of assessing variability is devised. This follows suggestions in a top quality assurance science panel report, dated January 2016.
  4. Due to the impacts of COVID-19, there aren’t any unsmoothed information available for wintering waterbirds in 2020/21, as such a latest 12 months change evaluation is unavailable.

Tractor icon The long-term decline of the farmland chicken indicator within the UK has been pushed primarily by the decline of these species which are restricted to, or extremely depending on, farmland habitats (the ‘specialists’, which account for 12 of the 19 species within the indicator). Between 1970 and 2022, the index for farmland specialists declined by 72% whereas for farmland generalists it declined by 22%. Of the 12 farmland specialists, 5 (corn bunting, gray partridge, starling, turtle dove, and tree sparrow) have skilled extreme declines in extra of 80% since 1970 due largely to modifications in farmland practices. Two farmland specialists (inventory dove and goldfinch) have greater than doubled over the identical interval, illustrating how responses to pressures varies amongst species. Generalist species have fared higher than specialists though the speed of decline for generalists has been much like the specialists within the brief time period.  Amongst the generalists, woodpigeon and jackdaw populations have greater than doubled relative to 1970 ranges whereas three of the generalist species have declined over the long-term interval: greenfinch by 69%, yellow wagtail by 66% and kestrel by 54%. Of the remaining two generalist species: rook numbers haven’t modified general, and reed bunting has declined at a decrease charge (-33% over the long-term). Overall, farmland birds have been impacted by modifications within the suitability of farmland for breeding and wintering in addition to pressures confronted by people who undertake lengthy migrations. However, most farmers can and do take optimistic steps to preserve birds on their land. In specific, quite a few incentive schemes encourage improved environmental stewardship in farming, with some measures particularly designed to assist stabilise and recuperate farmland chicken populations. These embody the availability of over-wintered stubbles and planted wild chicken crop covers to supply seed within the winter, uncropped margins on arable fields and sympathetic administration of hedgerows. There is rising proof that such motion can ship native recoveries in farmland chicken populations and thus, if delivered at acceptable scale, wider restoration. Changes in numbers skilled by some species could, to a lesser extent, be additional pushed by different pressures. For instance, there’s proof of an opposed impression from illness for some species, most notably greenfinch.

Tree icon The woodland chicken index comprises information for 37 species. The general development masks totally different underlying traits for specialist species, these that are extremely depending on woodland habitats, and generalist species, that are present in a variety of habitats, together with woodland. In 2022, the woodland specialists index was 55% decrease than in 1970, whereas the index for woodland generalists was 5% decrease than in 1970. Populations of two woodland generalist species (bullfinch and track thrush) have declined by greater than 45% since 1970. Only one species, long-tailed tit, has elevated (by 90%) on this interval. Four woodland specialists, lesser noticed woodpecker, noticed flycatcher, capercaillie and willow tit, have declined by over 90% relative to 1970 ranges. In distinction, populations of nuthatch have greater than trebled over the identical interval and each blackcap and nice noticed woodpecker have greater than quadrupled in numbers. Trends in long-distance migrants could presumably replicate altering situations on their wintering grounds whereas declines in residents corresponding to lesser noticed woodpecker, willow tit and capercaillie should be as a result of elements on their breeding grounds. Probable causes for this embody an absence of woodland administration (together with the cessation of conventional practices corresponding to coppicing) and elevated deer searching strain, each of which end in a decreased variety of woodland construction and decreased availability of appropriate nesting and foraging habitats. 

Waterdrop icon The breeding water and wetland chicken measure will be disaggregated to 4 sub-habitat indicators (birds of quick flowing water, birds of gradual and standing water, birds of reedbeds and birds of moist grasslands) though every consists of comparatively few species. The index for birds of reedbeds is made up of 4 species, and is exhibiting essentially the most optimistic development of those teams. In 2022 it was 16% larger than in 1975. In the brief time period it elevated by 8%. In birds of gradual flowing and standing water, which incorporates mallard, the index was 12% larger than in 1975. However, there was a 14% lower within the short-term interval between 2016 and 2021, reflecting a unfavorable turn-around within the fortunes of this group within the final decade. The index of birds of moist grassland, together with quite a few wader species, has decreased by 51% since 1975, and the index for birds of quick flowing water (together with dipper) decreased by 20% in comparison with 1975. 

Water icon The breeding seabird index has not been up to date for the reason that publication in 2020. Therefore the traits introduced right here precede the onset of avian flu in Britain’s seabirds and the devastating results this has had on many species.

The seabird measure is focussed on the marine surroundings. Accordingly, for quite a few species (e.g. herring gull, nice cormorant), the indicator makes use of information for coastal populations (colonies inside 5 km of the shoreline) solely, slightly than information from all breeding areas of those species. This focusses the indicator on modifications on the coast and in marine waters however means modifications in inland populations are usually not taken under consideration. In 2019, the breeding seabird index within the UK was 24% decrease than in 1986, barely above the bottom degree ever recorded (of 31% decrease than 1986, recorded in 2013). Despite fluctuations, the indicator was largely flat from 1986 till the early-2000s when seabird numbers began to say no and the long-term development (to 2018) exhibits a big 28% lower. However, extra just lately the unsmoothed breeding seabird index has elevated, non-significantly, by 3% between 2013 and 2018. One of the 13 seabird species has elevated for the reason that starting of the index in 1986; razorbill numbers have greater than doubled. Two species have declined strongly since 1986; Arctic skua by 80% and black-legged kittiwake by 64%. The decline of black-legged kittiwakes has been linked to local weather change impacts on marine meals webs, and fishery pressures. However, there was some enchancment within the brief time period, throughout which black-legged kittiwakes have proven a powerful enhance, of 20% between 2013 and 2018. In addition to black-legged kittiwakes one other two of the 13 seabird species have elevated strongly between 2013 and 2018; razorbill and sandwich tern by 35% and 26% respectively. Numbers of nice black-backed gull are lowering strongly by 32% within the brief time period, though the long-term development is a weak decline. Some seabirds have been impacted by way of predation by invasive non-native mammals corresponding to rats and mink, although profitable eradication programmes have been carried out in quite a few areas and populations of some species have undergone native recoveries consequently.

Flake icon The wintering waterbird measure elevated steadily from the 1975 to 1976 baseline and peaked in 1996, and has largely declined since, falling by 9% between 2016/2017 and 2021/2022. The separate wader and wildfowl indices present broadly comparable patterns of enhance adopted by lower, though the change within the wildfowl indicator has been better. Overall, the wildfowl index has almost doubled (97% enhance) and the wader index has elevated by 66% since 1975/1976. However, each peaked within the late Nineteen Nineties and have declined subsequently; between 2016/2017 and 2021/2022, the index for wildfowl declined by 11% and the index for waders declined by 5%. Long-term decreases had been noticed for the Bewick’s swan, European white-fronted goose, scaup, and pochard which declined by 87%, 70%, 68% and 60% respectively. Four of the 13 wildfowl species exhibiting the strongest will increase are: the British/Irish greylag goose, gadwall, whooper swan and Svalbard light-bellied Brent goose. The British/Irish greylag goose and gadwall are estimated to be growing in wintering numbers by 37-fold and 14-fold respectively. Wintering numbers of whooper swan and Svalbard light-bellied Brent goose are additionally estimated to have elevated by greater than 10-fold. Amongst waders, 33% of the wader species elevated, 60% confirmed little change and seven% declined. The indices for avocet and black-tailed godwit confirmed the strongest will increase, wintering numbers now greater than 12 and 9 instances what they was (and avocet is just included within the indicator since 1989/1990). Dunlin have proven the steepest decline, declining by 49% for the reason that winter of 1975/1976, and wintering numbers of ringed plover at the moment are 39% decrease.

Top

Indicator description

The indices for farmland, woodland and breeding wetland birds present the year-to-year fluctuation in relative abundance, reflecting the noticed modifications within the survey outcomes, and smoothed traits, that are used with their confidence intervals to formally assess the statistical significance of change over time. Smoothed traits scale back short-term peaks and troughs ensuing from, for instance, year-to-year climate and sampling variations.

Data from surveys of wintering waterbirds are based mostly on full counts on wetland and coastal websites of markedly various measurement. This means the usual bootstrapping strategies used to estimate confidence intervals for the farmland, woodland and wetland indices, that are based mostly on standardised sample-based surveys, can’t be utilized. Assessments of change for the waterbird index are subsequently made utilizing a ‘5% rule’. If the index has elevated or decreased by better than or equal to five%, the index is assessed as enhancing or deteriorating respectively. The change evaluation for the seabirds measure has been eliminated till a approach of assessing variability is devised. This follows suggestions in a top quality assurance science panel report, dated January 2016.

Composite indicators can masks numerous variation among the many species inside them. The bar charts offered alongside the headline chart exhibits the share of species inside that indicator which have elevated, decreased or proven little change. Whether an individual chicken species is outlined as growing or lowering has been determined by its charge of annual change over the time interval (lengthy or brief) of curiosity. If the speed of annual change would result in a inhabitants lower of fifty% (halving), or a inhabitants enhance of 100% (doubling) or extra over 25 years, the species is claimed to have proven a ‘strong decline’ or a ‘strong increase’ respectively. Rates of change lower than these however above +33% (enhance) or under -25% (lower) are labelled ‘weak’. Asymmetric thresholds are used for declines and will increase to symbolize symmetrical proportional change in an index. These thresholds for decline are based mostly on the charges used within the Birds of Conservation Concern standing evaluation for birds within the UK. Note that for many species, significantly over the longer interval, the change is statistically important.

Top

Relevance

Bird populations have lengthy been thought-about to supply an excellent indication of the broad state of wildlife. Birds occupy a variety of habitats and there are appreciable long-term information on modifications in chicken populations, which assist in the interpretation of shorter-term fluctuations in numbers. As they’re a well-studied taxonomic group, drivers of change for birds are higher understood than for different species teams, which permits for higher interpretation of any noticed modifications. Birds even have big cultural significance and are extremely valued as part of the UK’s pure surroundings by most of the people.

Top

Background

The indicator has been compiled along side the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), and the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust (WWT). Data are obtained from a variety of sources, principally:

Within the measures, every species is given equal weighting, and the annual index is the geometric imply of the individual species indices for that 12 months. Populations of individual species inside every measure could also be growing or lowering no matter the general traits. The individual species indices are largely derived by the modelling of sampled survey information, and estimates are revised when new information or improved methodologies are developed and utilized retrospectively to earlier years. Further particulars about species and strategies will be discovered on the British Trust for Ornithology web site and by downloading the technical background doc.

A desk itemizing the species which are included in every index will be discovered within the datasheet. For every species, an estimate of change in the long run and within the brief time period is given, in addition to an evaluation of whether or not the species development is growing or lowering.

Top

Goals and Targets

The UK and England Biodiversity Indicators are at the moment being assessed alongside the Environment Improvement Plan Targets, and the brand new Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework Targets, when this work has been accomplished the references to Biodiversity 2020 and the Aichi Global Biodiversity Framework Targets might be up to date.

Aichi Targets for which this can be a major indicator

Strategic Goal B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.

Aichi Target 7 icon

Target 7: By 2020, areas underneath agriculture, aquaculture and forestry are managed sustainably, making certain conservation of biodiversity.

Strategic Goal C. To enhance the standing of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic variety.

Aichi Target 12 icon

Target 12: By 2020, the extinction of identified threatened species has been prevented and their conservation standing, significantly of these most in decline, has been improved and sustained.

Aichi Targets for which this can be a related indicator

Strategic Goal B. Reduce the direct pressures on biodiversity and promote sustainable use.

Aichi Target 5 icon

Target 5: By 2020, the speed of lack of all pure habitats, together with forests, is a minimum of halved and the place possible introduced near zero, and degradation and fragmentation is considerably decreased.

Strategic Goal C. To enhance the standing of biodiversity by safeguarding ecosystems, species and genetic variety.

Aichi Target 11 icon

Target 11: By 2020, a minimum of 17 per cent of terrestrial and inland water, and 10 per cent of coastal and marine areas, particularly areas of specific significance for biodiversity and ecosystem companies, are conserved by way of successfully and equitably managed, ecologically consultant and properly linked techniques of protected areas and different efficient area-based conservation measures, and built-in into the broader panorama and seascapes.

Top

Top

Downloads

Download the Datasheet and Technical background doc from JNCC’s Resource Hub.

Top

Last up to date: 2023

Latest information available:  

2022 (farmland birds, woodland birds, wetland birds and seabirds);

2021 to 2022 (wintering waterbirds)

      2019 (Seabirds)

This content material is available on request as a pdf in non-accessible format. If you want for a duplicate please go to the enquiries web page.

 

- Advertisement -
Pet News 2Day
Pet News 2Dayhttps://petnews2day.com
About the editor Hey there! I'm proud to be the editor of Pet News 2Day. With a lifetime of experience and a genuine love for animals, I bring a wealth of knowledge and passion to my role. Experience and Expertise Animals have always been a central part of my life. I'm not only the owner of a top-notch dog grooming business in, but I also have a diverse and happy family of my own. We have five adorable dogs, six charming cats, a wise old tortoise, four adorable guinea pigs, two bouncy rabbits, and even a lively flock of chickens. Needless to say, my home is a haven for animal love! Credibility What sets me apart as a credible editor is my hands-on experience and dedication. Through running my grooming business, I've developed a deep understanding of various dog breeds and their needs. I take pride in delivering exceptional grooming services and ensuring each furry client feels comfortable and cared for. Commitment to Animal Welfare But my passion extends beyond my business. Fostering dogs until they find their forever homes is something I'm truly committed to. It's an incredibly rewarding experience, knowing that I'm making a difference in their lives. Additionally, I've volunteered at animal rescue centers across the globe, helping animals in need and gaining a global perspective on animal welfare. Trusted Source I believe that my diverse experiences, from running a successful grooming business to fostering and volunteering, make me a credible editor in the field of pet journalism. I strive to provide accurate and informative content, sharing insights into pet ownership, behavior, and care. My genuine love for animals drives me to be a trusted source for pet-related information, and I'm honored to share my knowledge and passion with readers like you.
-Advertisement-

Latest Articles

-Advertisement-

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!