For free actual time breaking information alerts despatched straight to your inbox signal as much as our breaking information emails
Sign as much as our free breaking information emails
Poultry farmers are ready for a decide’s ruling after turning into embroiled in a High Court struggle with ministers over compensation for birds culled due to avian flu.
A bunch of producers has taken authorized motion in opposition to Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary Steve Barclay.
Lawyers representing them have instructed a decide that Mr Barclay’s division’s “assessment” of compensation was “unlawful” – and {that a} coverage referring to compensation was additionally “unlawful”.
Ministers are combating the declare and say it must be dismissed.
Mrs Justice Hill on Wednesday completed overseeing a trial on the High Court in London.
Barrister Malcolm Birdling, who represented claimant poultry farmers, instructed the decide, in a written case define, {that a} secretary of state had powers below animal well being laws to “condemn to slaughter” wholesome birds in an effort to curb the unfold of avian flu topic to an obligation to pay compensation.
He mentioned cost selections had been made below a coverage that producers could be compensated for “healthy birds actually culled” versus “healthy birds condemned to be culled”.
Mr Birdling argued that the strategy had been fallacious.
Lawyers representing claimant producers mentioned farmers had suffered “devastating” losses and livelihoods had been “threatened”.
Mark Westmoreland Smith, who represented Mr Barclay, mentioned the center of the declare was a “question of statutory construction”.
He mentioned the “claimants’ construction” would “change the clear meaning” of statutory provision for “no good reason”.
Producers taking motion embody: LJ Fairburn & Son of Alford, Lincolnshire; J W Gate & Son of Wigton, Cumbria; Roy Scaman Farms, of Louth, Lincolnshire; and Yorkshire Farmhouse Eggs of Thirsk, North Yorkshire.
Farmers’ union the NFU is backing claimant corporations.
A spokesman mentioned in a press release, outdoors courtroom earlier than the listening to, that the litigation was an “important case about compensation” for poultry producers affected by chook flu.
He indicated that particular selections had been taken by the Animal and Plant Health Agency, which comes below Mr Barclay’s umbrella.
The spokesman mentioned producers had been arguing that laws underpinning a compensation scheme had been “misinterpreted” and affected farmers had not been “properly” compensated.
Mrs Justice Hill indicated that she would ship a ruling within the close to future.
