Dear Gary,
Our next-door neighbours requested to have scaffolding erected in our backyard so work may very well be carried out to their roof. In the spirit of co-operation, we agreed.
However, the scaffolding was positioned in a harmful method and our beloved Dalmatian canine, Wilf, sustained an harm which resulted in him being sedated to endure surgical procedure and have stitches.
We went via due course of and sued the scaffolding business within the small claims court docket for the vet’s payments incurred and obtained judgement for £979.24 plus £70 prices. However, they don’t seem to be paying up.
Our neighbour doesn’t want to be concerned and says it’s between us and the scaffolders.
Having paid our vet straight, we knowledgeable our pet insurance coverage firm of the occasions, in search of to be refunded by them. They stated we should pay the surplus (£95) and since we’ve got made a declare, we’ve got been advised the month-to-month premium will seemingly enhance on the subsequent renewal.
It has already gone up from £27 a month to £42 with out this declare being submitted.
We suppose the insurance coverage firm ought to pursue the scaffolders as a result of the coverage doc says they’ve that proper, however they don’t seem to be participating. We really feel caught within the center.
– Joan
Dear Joan,
I am very sorry to hear about Wilf, especially as his injury came about, essentially, because you were being a good neighbour. My own dog Jake required a major operation last year and so I can also relate to having to pay eye-wateringly expensive vet’s payments.
It appears to me you will have been extremely environment friendly in in search of justice and it’s irritating that it’s evading you. Hindsight is one of the best sight and I hesitate to criticise you within the circumstances of this very irritating scenario, however I believe in a means you will have been almost too environment friendly in pursuing each the scaffolders and your pet insurance coverage firm on the identical time.
Indeed, having a struggle on two fronts generally is a mistake since you are certainly caught within the center and undecided the place to focus your efforts. In my view, you need to have chosen one path to go down, reasonably than two.
Making a declare in your insurance coverage and leaving your insurers to pursue the scaffolders would have been one route.
However, I do respect that in doing that you will have ended up nonetheless being answerable for the surplus. And your insurers will almost definitely use the actual fact of your canine being injured to extend your premium on the premise his well being is now extra prone to be in jeopardy than if he had not been injured.
Even for those who had not made an insurance coverage declare, on the time of the subsequent renewal of the coverage you’d have needed to inform your insurance coverage firm of the harm and operation anyway, as a “relevant disclosure”.
Also, there’s a fear that though insurers have the precise to pursue third events (right here the scaffolders) in respect of losses to their insured (you), they don’t all the time accomplish that on the premise of a cost profit evaluation, specifically “is it worth it” to them?
In this case you will have managed to show it was price it as a result of you will have obtained authorized judgment. You took the route of pursuing the scaffolders straight and since you will have obtained judgment in opposition to them at court docket, your initiative has been justified.
But having gone down that route it’s now as much as you, and never your insurance coverage firm, to pursue it to its conclusion.
You are the so-called “claimant” who has obtained judgment in opposition to the scaffolders as “defendant”. In that sense, regardless of the facility the insurance coverage firm seeks to present themselves below their coverage doc, they don’t have any standing within the court docket case you initiated, so they can not ask the court docket to implement the debt.
It is you who has the facility and authority to implement the debt you will have proved on the court docket. The County Court will help with judgment money owed as much as £5,000.
The option to proceed is to make use of kind N323 to ask the court docket to situation a “warrant of control”. This is the official option to ask the court docket to ship a bailiff (typically referred to as “enforcement officer”) to the handle of the defendant given on the court docket order below which your judgment is recorded to gather the money owed.
The bailiff will first contact the defendant to ask for cost inside seven days. If the debt shouldn’t be paid, the bailiff will go to the debtor’s handle to see if something will be bought to pay the debt. The bailiff will solely have authorized authority to grab items owned by the named defendant.
Again, with hindsight, I might have sued your neighbour as a celebration to the declare collectively with the scaffolders as a result of the scaffolders have been appearing on his behalf. In that case, in case your declare in opposition to your neighbour was profitable, he would even be on the hook for the debt.
If you do get better the total debt from the scaffolders, you’ll be able to then withdraw your insurance coverage declare. The reality of the harm will nonetheless be identified to your insurers, however as I say, could be disclosable at subsequent renewal anyway.
In abstract, the route you will have taken means the strategy of concluding this case is in your arms when it comes to seeing via enforcement of the judgment obtained at court docket. I do hope you’re profitable – and greater than something I want Wilf a full restoration.
‘Ask A Lawyer’ shouldn’t be taken as formal authorized recommendation, however reasonably as a place to begin for readers to undertake their very own additional analysis.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 3 months with limitless access to our award-winning web site, unique app, money-saving affords and extra.
