Speaking within the Dail this Thursday, Mr McGrath stated: “If a legislative amendment is necessary and possible, it will be brought forward.”
This follows an Irish Independent story on Wednesday which highlighted how giant numbers of those mortgage holders whose loans had been offered to vulture funds are unable to make use of the ombudsman service to make complaints if they’re in dispute over the dealing with of their loans.
This is the case if their complaints relate to the time earlier than the credit score servicers, who act for the funds, had been registered with the Central Bank.
The credit score servicers have solely been required to be registered with the Central Bank since 2019 after earlier laws was tightened.
Mr McGrath his stated division’s authorized advisers are working to establish “a way forward so that the gap that has been identified is fixed”.
As many as 100,000 homeowners have had mortgages offered to vulture funds, with credit score servicing companies performing on behalf of the funds.
Elizabeth Mc Auley, who’s impacted, stated: “My complaint with the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman was submitted in 2020.”
He careworn that that each one customers will need to have equal access to the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman and instructed these current that his division is participating with the ombudsman with regard to its “interpretation of the legislation.”
As many as 100,000 homeowners have had mortgages offered to vulture funds, with credit score servicing companies performing on behalf of the funds.
But it has now emerged that giant numbers of those mortgage holders whose loans had been offered to vultures are unable to make use of the ombudsman service to make complaints if they’re in dispute over the dealing with of their loans.
This is the case if their complaints relate to the time earlier than the credit score servicers, who act for the funds, had been registered with the Central Bank.
The credit score servicers have solely been required to be registered with the Central Bank since 2019 after earlier laws was tightened.
Mr McGrath his stated division’s authorized advisers are working to establish “a way forward so that the gap that has been identified is fixed”.
Elizabeth Mc Auley, who’s impacted, stated: “My complaint with the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman was submitted in 2020.”
The ombudsman’s workplace got here again to her final December, saying it can’t examine the grievance because the agency coping with her mortgage was not registered till 2019.
Her mortgage was offered by Danske Bank in 2016.
Ms Mc Auley bought into monetary difficulties in 2018 and engaged with the credit score servicing agency performing for the fund that purchased her mortgage.
She stuffed out a regular monetary assertion (SFS) below the Mortgage Arrears Resolution Process (MARP).
“I never received an assessment of my SFS. I was in contact with them by email through an account manager who subsequently left the group,” she stated.
‘So, no alternative payment schedule was put in place to pay off the arrears’
She subsequently voluntarily offered her home late in 2019 after coming below stress to take action.
“I was made homeless for a couple of months. I was under severe mental anxiety and depression. I am 58 years of age with no hope of owning my own home again. I am struggling to pay private rent. I saved all my life and never had any other financial difficulties,” Ms Mc Auley added.
She had stopped funds on her mortgage when her mom was dying.
A single lady, she has been pressured to relocate to close Roscrea, Co Tipperary.
Ms Mc Auley made a grievance to the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (FSPO) in 2020 in regards to the failure by the fund and its credit score servicer agent to think about her SFS and put a plan in place to repay the arrears.
The ombudsman workplace got here again, in a letter seen by this publication, stating that it couldn’t think about the grievance in regards to the failure to evaluate the usual monetary assertion because the “complaint falls outside the jurisdiction of the FSPO to investigate”.
But the agency behind her mortgage was not registered right here on the time, so the ombudsman can’t act, it stated in a what’s a posh letter.
Ms Mc Auley stated: “I am sure they are a lot of Irish mortgage holders in exactly the same position as myself without a legal recourse to a vulture fund or its servicer as they were not registered with the Central Bank prior to 2019.”
Last week, the Dáil debated technical amendments to the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman Act.
Sinn Féin finance spokesman Pearse Doherty raised the difficulty of some vulture fund mortgages being excluded from the ombudsman’s companies.
Sinn Fein’s Pearse Doherty (Liam McBurney/PA)
“What we have now are thousands of mortgage holders with loans held by vulture funds who simply cannot make a complaint about the conduct of these funds where the conduct occurred prior to 2019 or, in many instances, even during 2019,” Mr Doherty stated.
“It is a serious issue. The FSPO has made determinations on this issue and they are crystal-clear.
“These are loans that were unfairly sold to vulture funds, which do not now have equal access to the Financial Service Pensions Ombudsman, despite all of the commitments we heard at the time.”
He stated this loophole was not being handled within the amendments earlier than the Oireachtas for the time being.
Asked if there are any plans to rectify the scenario, which is excluding 1000’s of vulture fund prospects from utilizing the ombudsman’s workplace, a spokesperson for Finance Minister Michael McGrath’s Department of Finance didn’t straight reply this query.
The spokesperson confirmed: “Where a complaint is made against a provider who was not a regulated financial service provider at the time the conduct complained of is said to have occurred, the FSPO does not have jurisdiction to investigate the conduct which is the subject matter of the complaint against that provider.”
The FSPO stated its statutory features are strictly ruled by the provisions of the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman Act 2017.
Asked what number of vulture mortgages circumstances it has rejected as companies complained of weren’t registered on the time the conduct was alleged, the FSPO stated it doesn’t have that information.
