Experts agree that to restrict the worst impacts of the climate crisis, we have to drastically change the way in which we produce vitality around the globe. However, a counter-narrative has emerged, contending that the impacts of transitioning to a system dominated by renewable vitality will hurt communities and nature. But we should not lose sight of the large image: total, renewables are significantly better for individuals and nature and we have now instruments to not simply keep away from or decrease any damaging impacts however to plan and build in ways in which begin to restore nature.
Transformation of the vitality sector requires world systemic change that mixes all crucial modifications at a neighborhood, regional, and nationwide stage. A fast vitality transformation is just not with out impacts on pure sources and native communities nevertheless it’s far much less dangerous than persevering with down our present path of powering our world primarily with fossil fuels. We have to shift to an vitality system that considers the prices and advantages to nature in all phases of planning, design, improvement, and decision-making.
In a first-of-its-kind evaluation, WWF and Boston Consulting Group examine a fast transition to renewable vitality to our present strategy dominated by fossil fuels throughout key areas together with mining, air high quality, water high quality, ecosystems, biodiversity, human well-being, and space footprint. The outcomes present {that a} fast transition to renewable vitality is dramatically higher for nature, human well being and security, and jobs.
Take a take a look at a few of the most compelling findings.
