Thursday, May 9, 2024
Thursday, May 9, 2024
HomePet Industry NewsPet Charities NewsSussex health center trust leaders 'acknowledge just how much work still lies...

Sussex health center trust leaders ‘acknowledge just how much work still lies ahead’ after damning assessment report

Date:

Related stories

-Advertisement-spot_img
-- Advertisment --
- Advertisement -

Leaders at a Sussex health center trust said they ‘understand the challenges’ after the latest assessment report was released.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has actually devalued the general ranking of University Hospital Sussex NHS Foundation Trust from exceptional to needs enhancement. It follows an examination in between October and December ‘showed a decline in the care’ being provided to individuals ‘across several key areas’.

In action, health center leaders at the trust said: “We understand the challenges, we have made significant progress already, and we know there’s much more to do.”

The CQC report associates with 7 examinations at the trust over an 18-month duration – the most recent of which was simply over seven-months back, and took a look at the ‘well-led’ domain. The trust’s general ranking has actually been altered from exceptional to needs enhancement, while the ‘well-led’ domain was decreased to insufficient.

The overall rating for Royal Sussex County Hospital has fallen from good to inadequate as has the hospital’s rating for safe and well-led. Effective remains good, caring remains outstanding and responsive remains requires improvement. (Photo by Andrew Hasson/Getty Images)The overall rating for Royal Sussex County Hospital has fallen from good to inadequate as has the hospital’s rating for safe and well-led. Effective remains good, caring remains outstanding and responsive remains requires improvement. (Photo by Andrew Hasson/Getty Images)
The general ranking for Royal Sussex County Hospital has actually fallen from good to insufficient as has the health center’s ranking for safe and well-led. Effective stays good, caring stays exceptional and responsive remains needs enhancement. (Photo by Andrew Hasson/Getty Images)

UHSussex president Dr George Findlay identified that, ‘like all NHS organisations’, the trust ‘needs to improve’ as it deals with ‘challenges around staffing, fast-growing need for hospital services and recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic’.

He likewise highlighted the ‘significant positive changes’ that have actually occurred both prior to and because the latest CQC assessment in October 2022 – ‘including huge investment in better facilities, a new leadership structure, recruitment at all levels and a big effort to encourage a more open culture’.

Dr Findlay said: “When I took up this role just under a year ago, I commissioned an external review to give me a clear picture of where we stood as a newly formed trust – our strengths and our weaknesses. This review, and our improvement plans were shared with the CQC at the time of our well-led inspection.

“Everything the CQC is saying now chimes with what we already knew, and had committed to addressing right from the start.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has downgraded the overall rating of University Hospital Sussex NHS Foundation Trust from outstanding to requires improvement.The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has downgraded the overall rating of University Hospital Sussex NHS Foundation Trust from outstanding to requires improvement.
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) has downgraded the overall rating of University Hospital Sussex NHS Foundation Trust from outstanding to requires improvement.

“I’m extremely proud of the huge strides that colleagues have made, but we all recognise how much work still lies ahead. The seven months since this inspection have seen rapid progress – now we need to push on again.”

The University Hospital Sussex NHS Foundation Trust is accountable for 7 medical facilities in Sussex; Worthing Hospital; St Richard’s Hospital in Chichester; Princess Royal Hospital in Haywards Heath; Southlands Hospital in Shoreham-by-Sea in addition to the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Royal Alexandra Children’s Hospital and Sussex Eye Hospital – all in Brighton and Hove.

The assessment was ‘in part prompted by whistleblowing concerns from staff’, a CQC representative said.

Deanna Westwood, CQC’s director of operations in the south, said the assessment was performed ‘in response to concerns raised with us around culture and leadership’. She said staff and individuals utilizing services ‘were being let down by senior leaders’, including: “Staff informed us they felt not able to raise issues without worry of reprisal.”

How well-led both Worthing Hospital and St Richard’s Hospital (pictured) has declined from outstanding to good, although both remain rated outstanding overall. Both hospitals also keep their outstanding ratings for being effective, caring and responsive and their good rating for safety.How well-led both Worthing Hospital and St Richard’s Hospital (pictured) has declined from outstanding to good, although both remain rated outstanding overall. Both hospitals also keep their outstanding ratings for being effective, caring and responsive and their good rating for safety.
How well-led both Worthing Hospital and St Richard’s Hospital (imagined) has actually decreased from exceptional to good, although both stay ranked exceptional general. Both medical facilities likewise keep their exceptional scores for working, caring and responsive and their good ranking for safety.

The trust highlighted a variety of enhancements made throughout Dr Findlay’s very first year as president. These consisted of:

– A brand-new management advancement program to support leaders throughout the trust;

– A brand-new medical design to provide strong management to medical departments and private health center websites;

– Trust-broad concentrate on making it much easier for individuals to speak out and raise issues, consisting of more powerful assistance for the Freedom to Speak Up service;

How well-led both Worthing Hospital (pictured) and St Richard’s Hospital (pictured) has declined from outstanding to good, although both remain rated outstanding overall. Both hospitals also keep their outstanding ratings for being effective, caring and responsive and their good rating for safety.How well-led both Worthing Hospital (pictured) and St Richard’s Hospital (pictured) has declined from outstanding to good, although both remain rated outstanding overall. Both hospitals also keep their outstanding ratings for being effective, caring and responsive and their good rating for safety.
How well-led both Worthing Hospital (imagined) and St Richard’s Hospital (imagined) has actually decreased from exceptional to good, although both stay ranked exceptional general. Both medical facilities likewise keep their exceptional scores for working, caring and responsive and their good ranking for safety.

– Results from the confidential month-to-month ‘Pulse’ staff study reveal more individuals now feel great that the trust would act on issues that were raised – up from 49 percent in September 2022 to 58 percent in March 2023, ‘closing in on the very best-performing trusts nationally’;

– £120m invested throughout all health center websites (above and beyond the £500m Louisa Martindale Building and prepared £48m redevelopment of A&E in Brighton);

– Weekly, structured sessions with frontline staff including the entire executive group, and several executive staff member spending quality time with frontline groups, every day

The trust said there has actually likewise been ‘strong progress in patient care’, consisting of:

– A substantial decrease in the variety of individuals dealing with the longest waits on treatment – ‘now only just over 250 people’;

– Ambulance hold-ups of an hour or more to 3.2 percent, from 9 percent at the end of 2022;

– Waits of more than 6 weeks for diagnostics down by almost a 3rd because late 2022;

– Strengthening efficiency for cancer waiting times, both for medical diagnosis, and treatment.

The CQC group checking out in 2022 likewise concluded that brand-new techniques would ‘improve quality for patients and staff’; that the ‘majority of leaders’ had the experience, capability and ability ‘to lead effectively’; most clients applauded the care, treatment and assistance they received; the executive group had a suitable series of abilities, understanding and experience and the brand-new operating design ‘appeared to provide clear structures and evidenced multi-disciplinary leadership’ throughout health center websites and departments.

Dr Findlay said: “Right from my first day, the focus has been on facing up to our problems and giving our amazing staff the tools and support they need to do their jobs. None of the issues raised in this report are new to us, and that is why we were already addressing them.

“Much has changed since the CQC team was here, and that progress makes me confident for the future – delivering NHS care at the moment is really tough, making improvements is tough, but we have the plans and the people in place to do that.”

In neurosurgery, services inspectors found:

– The service did not have enough staff to care for people and keep them safe;

– Staff did not always feel respected, supported and valued;

– Staff did not always work well together for the benefit of people;

– Some consultants did not engage with people using services including sharing information regarding their medical conditions;

– The environment and availability of equipment did not always support safe and effective care and treatment. For example, there were incidents of surgery being delayed due to a lack of imaging equipment.

Trust-wide inspectors found that:

– Some staff felt their experiences of bullying and harassment ‘went unaddressed’ because of the seniority of the staff ‘allegedly carrying out the bullying’ and because they saw historical working relationships with senior executives as a ‘deterrent to raising their concerns’;

– Staff felt there was ‘little point raising concerns’ because ‘no action was taken when they did’;

– Although the trust had responded to the cultural concerns in surgery at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, it has had a ‘limited impact’. Some consultants ‘continued to display poor behaviours’ which meant a lot of staff felt ‘undervalued, unsafe, and unsupported’;

– Most staff did not know who the Freedom to Speak Up Guardian was, or how to contact them;

– Staff believed there was a ‘culture of bullying and harassment’ which ‘pressured them in to making unsafe decisions’;

– Minority ethnic staff survey results showed they were ‘more likely to experience poorer outcomes than their white colleagues’.

In response, Adam Doyle, Chief Executive Officer of NHS Sussex, said: “We acknowledge the findings of the report and are working closely with the trust, the Care Quality Commission and NHS England to ensure the necessary improvements are made.

“We recognise the hard work and progress that has already been made to address many of the areas outlined in the report and will continue to support the trust to deliver the improvement plans that are in place for some of the other long-standing challenges that will take time to address, both across the organisation and in collaboration with system partners.”

Alan Boyd, president of Brighton and Hove Healthwatch, said the latest CQC ranking is ‘clearly disappointing’ for clients however ‘also all staff who work incredibly hard to ensure that patients receive excellent care’.

He included: “Of specific issue is that services at the Royal Sussex County are ruled out to be safe although clients must be assured that the care used throughout the trust has actually been ranked as ‘outstanding’.

“Healthwatch works carefully with the senior management group at the trust and have actually been assured by the actions that have actually already been put in location to provide the needed enhancements.

“We require to support our trust as it continues its recuperate from COVID-19 and embeds modification to provide enhancements and Healtwatch will exist to do this whilst using vital difficulty and promoting the client voice and experience.”

- Advertisement -
Pet News 2Day
Pet News 2Dayhttps://petnews2day.com
About the editor Hey there! I'm proud to be the editor of Pet News 2Day. With a lifetime of experience and a genuine love for animals, I bring a wealth of knowledge and passion to my role. Experience and Expertise Animals have always been a central part of my life. I'm not only the owner of a top-notch dog grooming business in, but I also have a diverse and happy family of my own. We have five adorable dogs, six charming cats, a wise old tortoise, four adorable guinea pigs, two bouncy rabbits, and even a lively flock of chickens. Needless to say, my home is a haven for animal love! Credibility What sets me apart as a credible editor is my hands-on experience and dedication. Through running my grooming business, I've developed a deep understanding of various dog breeds and their needs. I take pride in delivering exceptional grooming services and ensuring each furry client feels comfortable and cared for. Commitment to Animal Welfare But my passion extends beyond my business. Fostering dogs until they find their forever homes is something I'm truly committed to. It's an incredibly rewarding experience, knowing that I'm making a difference in their lives. Additionally, I've volunteered at animal rescue centers across the globe, helping animals in need and gaining a global perspective on animal welfare. Trusted Source I believe that my diverse experiences, from running a successful grooming business to fostering and volunteering, make me a credible editor in the field of pet journalism. I strive to provide accurate and informative content, sharing insights into pet ownership, behavior, and care. My genuine love for animals drives me to be a trusted source for pet-related information, and I'm honored to share my knowledge and passion with readers like you.
-Advertisement-

Latest Articles

-Advertisement-

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!