Child Q’s collapse on 25 June 2016 needed 53 minutes of intervention from the on-call registrar.
Letby informs the jury it was still “not on the scale” of a severe collapse.
“Child P remained in a really bad method,” Nick Johnson KC, for the prosecution, says, including that Letby has actually dismissed it as unimportant.
“I did not state it was unimportant,” Letby responds however includes that she would not recommend it was on the exact same level as the other events associated with this case.
Over the course of the following graveyard shift, Child Q “ended up being better”, according to a note taken right before 10.30pm.
Mr Johnson says Letby was provided Child Q in good condition and he “left your hands on a ventilator in extensive care however by 10.29pm was going back to normality”.
“I do not believe you can state a child on a ventilator is going back to normality,” Letby says.
She rejects attempting to eliminate the child by pumping him with air and liquid.
Letby says she “strolled in on a discussion” in between coworkers and ended up being “worried I was being delegated something that did not take place”.
