Keith Byrne and Sophie Singer, of Beauchamp Court, Wilmington Gardens, have been sentenced yesterday (April 22) at Lewes Crown Court, after being discovered responsible of three Animal Welfare Act offences at an earlier listening to, mentioned the RSPCA.
The court docket heard how the pair left their 14-year-old pet boxer canine Bentley home alone in a ‘terrible condition’ to go on a household vacation in 2022. Concerned neighbours discovered the canine ‘collapsed at the bottom of the stairs’ and contacted the RSPCA for assist after ‘desperately trying to provide him with food’, the charity mentioned.
Byrne and Singer had claimed they cherished the canine, and blamed his ailing well being on his age, in response to the RSPCA, whereas a choose mentioned the pair had behaved ‘appallingly’.
After disqualifying each Byrne and Singer from proudly owning all animals for 5 years, with no attraction for 3 years, Judge Laing KC mentioned: “[The dog’s] ribs and pelvis were plain for anyone to see, his skin was in a terrible state and you could not have failed to miss these factors.
“You have stated some bizarre reasoning which you insist upon in your defence. This is a ridiculous account and this dog was clearly suffering substantially.
“You have behaved appallingly and I’m at a loss to understand how you could let this happen.”
Keith Byrne was sentenced to 9 months custody, suspended for 2 years, and ordered to hold out 300 hours of unpaid work, whereas Sophie Singer was sentenced to 6 months custody, suspended for 2 years, and ordered to hold out 200 hours of unpaid work, the RSPCA confirmed. Both have been ordered to pay £350 prices.
RSPCA Inspector Tony Woodley, who attended the scene, mentioned: “I stepped to the base of the stairs and could see the dog, a tan coloured boxer type dog.
“The dog was emaciated and I was not sure it was alive. I touched the dog’s face and he twitched.
“I immediately dialled 999 and was given permission to remove the dog for emergency treatment.
“I saw some food at the base of the stairs and a bowl of water. The other residents of nearby properties advised me that they had placed the food and water for the dog. I saw that the dog’s ribs, hips and spine were prominent and the nails on its paws were extremely overgrown and curling around.
“The dog’s eyes were sunken.”
A full put up mortem was carried out and located that Bentley was in ‘extremely poor body condition’, whereas his ‘stomach contained a large amount of rubbish, including numerous food wrappers and a felt pen’, that are ‘indicative of scavenging due to hunger’, a veterinary pathologist mentioned.
Bentley additionally had stress sores on his elbows and ankles, giant areas of alopecia, and a decrease bowel perforation brought on by ‘movement of the foreign body through the upper intestine’.
After sentencing, Inspector Woodley mentioned: “This poor dog was suffering in pain while his owners, who had left him, went on a family holiday.
“The owners of the dog had clearly failed to provide for Bentley and the claim that he was ‘old and tired’ does not excuse the suffering he was caused through the inactions of Byrne and Singer.
“This case should be seen as a clear warning that just because an animal is old this does not mean that an owner has an excuse not to provide it with basic care and veterinary treatment.”