Plans for a 2,000-home settlement in Canterbury have been slammed by locals as ‘revolution not evolution’. The controversial plans had been branded a “dog’s breakfast” by involved villagers.
Land owned by cash-strapped University of Kent to the north of its metropolis campus has been earmarked for an enormous growth within the district’s new draft Local Plan. In the doc – which covers housebuilding as much as 2040 – Canterbury City Council (CCC) proposes building the sprawling property on a web site between the villages of Tyler Hill, Blean and Rough Common.
The 2,000 properties make up greater than a fifth of the 9,346 included within the latest model of the draft Local Plan, which has been put out for public session by the Labour-Lib Dem administration. The earlier model – printed underneath the Conservatives in 2022 – earmarked plots for 13,496 properties as much as 2045, however the university-owned web site was not amongst them.
READ MORE: Final permission given for controversial 250 home property in one among Kent’s greatest seaside cities
READ MORE: ‘Wonderful’ Kent fish and chip store named as among the finest within the UK
Its inclusion now has sparked a fierce backlash, with many villagers becoming a member of a fiery gathering on Thursday (March 14) night time to debate the proposals. About 60 residents packed into the Hackington Parish Council assembly on the Tyler Hill Memorial Hall.
Parish council chair Ania Bobrowicz instructed them: “As many of you know, the University of Kent owns a lot of land around here. It is also in very serious financial difficulties. To say that we are dismayed by these plans is probably an understatement.”
The land was put ahead for potential growth by the college, which just lately introduced cuts to programs and jobs. The web site has now been thought of viable by CCC for a “highly sustainable, freestanding settlement” of about 2,000 properties, together with a brand new major faculty and a alternative for the prevailing Blean Primary School.
The authority says it desires to create a “complete, compact and well-connected neighbourhood, where everyday needs can be met within a 15-minute walk or short cycle”. Villager John Reilly, who has lived in Tyler Hill for greater than 50 years, instructed the assembly London-based property companies have already been in contact with native parishes meaning to “soften up local opposition”.
Cllr Bobrowicz confirmed representatives of world actual property advisor Avison Young – which is appearing as a planning marketing consultant for the college – have emailed providing shows to locals on the probabilities for the brand new growth.
But metropolis councillor for the world Alex Ricketts (Lib Dem) attended the assembly, telling residents: “It doesn’t mean a thing will or won’t happen just because it’s in the Local Plan. The University of Kent was always probably going to submit land.”
However, he did stress that the council is topic to authorities targets for housebuilding: “These targets have always been advisory, but try to not meet them and they will be imposed on you,” he stated.
County councillor for the world Cllr Rob Thomas (Con) added: “If you don’t have a Local Plan it is kind of bedlam.”
When native councils don’t build sufficient homes to hit authorities targets or fail to provide a Local Plan, central authorities can drive them to simply accept extra housing in locations that will ordinarily be refused.
Cllr John Lovery instructed the attendees he went to a Blean Parish Council assembly earlier within the week to debate the plans, saying: “Quite simply put, it’s a dog’s breakfast. People took the view it was a complete mess.”
He then requested the room “is there anyone here who thinks it’s a good idea?” and was met with silence, regardless of one native urging somebody to talk up “if you’re brave enough”.
The council says its imaginative and prescient for the positioning will present “important opportunities to create large new areas of open spaces, creating significant separation from Blean and Tyler Hill”.
But John Reilly says he isn’t satisfied the proposed new settlement is not going to considerably influence the encompassing villages.
“I’m very distressed by it,” he instructed the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) after the assembly.
“The impact of such a large community alongside two quite small villages will be quite damaging to the environment.”
He was additionally unconvinced by arguments about housing targets, saying: “The targets are bogus. I think that here, whatever they say, Canterbury can’t actually sustain the sheer volume and numbers of all the development. It’s going to be an urban settlement, not a rural settlement.”
Susan Sullivan, who has lived in Tyler Hill for 34 years, instructed the LDRS it seems like builders “are not really interested in what the future will be for the people who live here, they’re just looking at money”.
Official authorities targets are for 300,000 homes to be constructed throughout the nation yearly.
Ms Sullivan continued: “We need houses but I think it’s out of proportion with the area. Evolution is better than revolution and this is a revolution of a type.”
Villager and native yoga teacher June King added: “I know housing is a problem, I know people have to live somewhere, but you want to feel that you’re being listened to and I think sometimes you feel you’re not. They don’t care; they just want to build houses, and they’re not really that worried about the people that live in these places.”
The draft Local Plan was printed on March 1 and put out to public session by the council’s cupboard committee 10 days later. It will run till June 3, with residents capable of give their views on-line and by put up.
Once the session ends, the council will revisit among the proposals in mild of the suggestions, then put it out for session once more earlier than presenting it to the federal government’s Planning Inspectorate by June 30, 2025. The Inspectorate has the ultimate say on the plan, and will ship CCC again to the drafting board if it doesn’t meet key standards akin to housing targets – although the council’s proposals do fulfill the numbers requested for.
A spokesman for the University of Kent stated: “We’re happy to be supporting growth of a brand new freestanding settlement for round 2,000 properties on unused land to the north of our campus. Canterbury has a essential want for extra housing inventory and this allocation would assist the town council to handle this, liberating up land on our property to the broader good thing about the area people, whereas enabling the college to generate funding for additional funding in its core academic supply.
“We are keen to hear from local stakeholders on this and will be proactively engaging with key groups in areas affected by the plans to get as full an understanding as possible of their interests.” For extra planning notices in your space go to publicnoticeportal.uk.
Get extra information from KentStay straight to your inbox without spending a dime HERE.
