Editor’s note: This is sequel of a series of posts in relation to the health and well-being of neighborhood cats in San Marcos and Hays County.
In early June, at the peak of “kitten season” in Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott signed House Bill 3660 into law. The bipartisan costs extends security from dealing with criminal charges when returning decontaminated cats to the wild.
The costs intends to secure individuals who take part in Trap-Neuter-Release (TNR) programs in the state. According to the not-for-profit organization For All Animals, a Trap-Neuter-Release program (likewise referred to as Trap-Neuter-Return) is “an animal control management practice where neighborhood cats are humanely caught, decontaminated by a vet, immunized versus rabies, eartipped and went back to the trapping place. These cats can vary from feral, in which they have no interaction with people at all — to a neighborhood cat, one that is a tame roaming living within a human-protected nest.
TNR has actually been carried out for years by people, however is now practiced by shelter workers, vets and animal control officers also.
HB 3660 moved through legislative channels without challenge, but now the change to the law has actually rekindled the debate over whether TNR programs are the best way to manage community cat colonies.
Animal advocates like Sharri Boyett, founder of Prevent A Litter of Central Texas (PALS), argue that TNR is the only effective and humane practice in dealing with community cat colonies.
“Putting them back in their colony where there’s at least a food source is the goal, as opposed to allowing them to keep reproducing,” Boyett said.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the strongest opposition to TNR and wild community cat colonies comes from the birding community. Stephen Ramirez, who leads a guided San Marcos Bird Walk on the first Saturday of every month, said that he leans on what the American Bird Conservancy has actually to say when it comes to the welfare of wild and endangered birds.
According to the ABC, “Trap, Neuter, Release (TNR) is advertised as a tool to reduce feral cat numbers. Unfortunately, TNR programs have been shown to fail to reduce feral cat populations while simultaneously maintaining feral cats on the landscape, where they contribute to wildlife and public health risks.”
The Texas Parks and Wildlife Department supported this conclusion in a brief issued in 2014 regarding the efficacy of TNR programs, citing that “Feral and free-roaming cats alter the ecological balance of a region, as does any other feral non-native (exotic) animal.”
As hunters, cats are particularly rapacious. According to statistics in the TPWD brief, free-roaming domestic cats kill between 1.4 – 3.7 billion birds annually. Those are ordinary house cats and not those in an established wild or feral colony.
“A lot of people say that they should be inside,” Boyett said. “But people leave their cats out. So you either fix them, or just let them keep having more babies.” As an animal welfare advocate for the last twenty years, Boyett has witnessed many changes in public sentiments regarding neighborhood cat nests. “These days, TNR is pretty embraced,” Boyett said. “Even the bird people say, ‘We get it. Now you’re fixing these cats so instead of that many multiplying cats, we have less cats eating the birds. People who love cats certainly don’t want them to be trapped and killed, which is what they’ve been doing for a hundred years, and that never worked. Nature had a vacuum, so those cats actually produced larger litters when you removed some and killed them. They had less competition for food.”
Boyett is referring to a phenomenon in conservation studies called “The Vacuum Effect.”
The website for Alley Cat Allies explains this effect as a territorial vacancy that occurs when a portion of any animal population is removed from their home range. After a temporary period of lower numbers, other members of the same species will return from neighboring areas to utilize the same shelter and resources that sustained the original population.
Ultimately, both sides of the argument hope to achieve the same thing: to protect wild and endangered animals within a given environment. Birding organizations across the state have extensive outreach programs dedicated to protecting wild bird populations.
In San Marcos and the greater Hays County area, animal supporters are also working on programs that will further address the issue of unspayed neighborhood cats before they add to the already burgeoning feline population.
This is Part Two in a series of articles about current initiatives regarding pet well-being in San Marcos and Hays County. Part 3 will go over these advancements in more information.
