Who to blame for animal illness eliminating human beings? Report says it’s U.S.

Harvard Law School and NYU Center for Environmental & Animal Protection provide a surprise for the majority of Americans (however not for you!)

“For many Americans,  concepts such as ‘bushmeat’ or ‘wildlife farming’ seem foreign,”  opens Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  “but they refer to practices that are common within the United States as well,  differentiated only by the language we use to describe them.”

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  freshly co-published by the Harvard Law School and the Center for Environmental & Animal Protection at New York University,  uses little bit,  consisting of that insight,  which will amaze long time readers of ANIMALS 24-7.

You read it here initially,  and now it’s main

Informed mainly by several day-to-day publications from ProMED,  the Program for Monitoring Emerging Diseases,  in which ANIMALS 24-7 has actually gotten involved given that within days of ProMED’s launching in 1994,  we have actually thoroughly covered almost every subject raised by Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  lot of times,  while questioning if anybody beyond ProMED and our own readership is taking note.

But Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States succinctly puts the entire mosaic of lethal zoonotic illness dangers arising from American treatment of animals together in between one set of covers,  with distinguished names and a thick alphabet soup of postgraduate degrees to provide focus to the conversation.

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States explains that in spite of all the wagging fingers pointed at China just recently over break outs of SARS,  the H5N1 bird influenza,  and COVID-19 ,  “More emerging infectious diseases originated in the United States than in any other country in the world during the second half of the 20th century,”  consisting of the 1918 “Spanish” influenza pandemic.

“Spanish” influenza & 2009 swine influenza pandemic both began here

Contrary to typical belief,  the 1918 influenza pandemic—which “infected roughly 500 million people,  one-third of the world’s total population,  killing 12 times as many in absolute terms as has COVID-19 to date, ”  did not start in Spain,  nor in China.

Rather,  the “Spanish” influenza “appears to have been born of humble origins deep in the American Heartland,”  dispersing from here to the remainder of the world,  advise the 6 co-authors and 5 customers of Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the U.S.

As just recently as 2009,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the U.S. remembers,  “the influenza strain H1N1,  known as ‘swine flu,’  swept through the U.S.,  infecting more than 100 million Americans and hospitalizing over 900,000.”

(See COVID-19 & “The Next Big One”: Spillover reviewed.)

“A poorly interlocking system”

Then came COVID-19,  coming from China,  however eliminating 1.2 million Americans,  almost two times as lots of as anywhere else.

This took place mainly since “There is no single,  unified federal or state authority responsible for the prevention,  detection,  and regulation of zoonotic disease.  Rather,  regulatory authority is divided among different government agencies,  each tasked with overseeing particular types of animals or activities,”   Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the U.S. observes,  from the cumulative point of views of several attorneys and ecological health researchers.

“The result,”  they continue,  “is a poorly interlocking system whereby animals are divided into artificial categories and governed along similarly arbitrary divisions of administrative authority.”

Administrative bungling

In lack of any one federal company with total jurisdiction over zoonotic illness,  administrative bungling from then-U.S. president Donald Trump on down left the U.S. with a more inefficient and inadequate reaction than any other industrialized country––and as lots of deaths as Brazil and India integrated,  which have in between them more than 4 times as many individuals.

“Trouble spots and gaps arise,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the U.S. discusses, “when animals are governed by regulatory categories such as ‘wildlife’ or ‘livestock,’  but do not fit neatly into either category.

“While disease can jump freely from wildlife to livestock to humans and back,  the U.S. regulatory system struggles to exercise this same kind of flexibility.  And because zoonotic disease touches on many different policy areas—including human health,  environmental health,  and animal health—it often falls on the fault lines between agencies,  resulting in a lack of unified and comprehensive government action.”

Not even China has similar guilt

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States exhibits this underlying issue by looking initially in depth at wildlife trafficking,  a concern in which no other country,  not even China,  has similar guilt.

The U.S. is “the largest importer of wildlife in the world,  bringing in more than 220 million live wild animals and their diseases each year.”

Yet,  “An overwhelming majority of live wild animals are never physically inspected upon entering the country,  nor are they quarantined,”  since the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service “has no legal authority to check wildlife imports for disease unless mandated to do so by another agency,” such as the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention or the Department of Agriculture.

“If you try to bring a dog or cat home from abroad with you,  your “companion animal may be required to go through veterinary checks and a 30-day quarantine period,”  notes Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  “while a commercial wholesaler importing hundreds of sugar gliders or other wild animals would not be subject to either process.  Similarly, an individual cannot bring meat from abroad back to the United States,  but one can import live wild animals from those same countries with very little scrutiny.”

High-threat types in American houses

Reminds Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  mentioning a number of examples,  “The exotic pet trade is problematic from a public health standpoint because it brings high-risk species into American homes,”  and not simply sometimes.

Indeed,  “studies have shown that at least 50%–90% of snakes, turtles, and lizards are carriers of salmonella,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States sums up,  yet “these animals are handled and held by individuals,  often children,  with few sanitary precautions.

“Other diseases are rare but can be quite deadly,”  particularly those brought by non-human primates,  such as “yellow fever,  Ebola,  dengue,  viral hepatitis,  and disease caused by poxviruses,”  also as herpes B,  brought by 80%–90% of macaques,  sent through bites.

“Monkeys have also been shown to transmit bacterial zoonotic diseases to humans including tuberculosis and others,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States points out in passing.

Invisible hazard

However,  “While the exotic pet trade is vast in scale,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States cautions,  “it is also largely invisible. Exotic pet auctions and swap meets typically do not allow cameras.  Sales frequently take place without adequate record-keeping.  The exotic pet industry has proven highly resistant to regulation.

“Yet,  the catalog of species and associated diseases involved in the trade is seemingly endless,”  with neither the Endangered Species Act nor the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna & Flora consisting of any arrangements to obstruct zoonoses.

“The Animal Welfare Act requires breeders,  wholesalers,  dealers,  transporters,  and sellers of exotic and wild animals to be licensed,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  permits,  “but only provides limited oversight.

“Moreover,  Animal Welfare Act provisions have little direct impact on disease risk,  and the Act exempts broad categories of animals—including reptiles,  amphibians,  birds,”  and most rodents.

Zoonotic illness connected to hunting eliminates more individuals than hunting mishaps

Hunting also provides significant zoonotic illness threat,  with little awareness of the threat aspects amongst either the individuals or the regulators.

“Wild aquatic birds,  the natural reservoirs for avian influenza,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States points out,  “have transmitted low pathogenic strains of virus to hunters.  If more deadly high pathogenic strains of the virus were introduced in North America,”  which might accompany fall migration in any year after waterfowl from all over the world spend the summer season blending and socializing inside the Arctic Circle,  “the risk for human exposure to the virus through hunting could be substantial.”

Such direct exposure can be indirect.  For circumstances,  droppings from contaminated migratory waterfowl are thought to have actually triggered “documented H5N1 outbreaks at 16 game bird farms in the last year alone,”  the authors of Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States note.

Mixing types who would never ever fulfill in nature

Captive hunting operations,  like the unique family pet trade,  “allow for the mixing of a wide range of species from different continents that would never encounter one another in nature,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States discusses.  “This interspecies contact may offer pathogens additional opportunities to spread among species and provide them new pathways to reach humans.

“Other conditions of captive hunting facilities also lend themselves to zoonotic transmission. For example,  animals are artificially concentrated in large numbers,  with both native and non-native species confined in fenced areas sharing the same feeding stations and water sources.”

(See Add to COVID-19 toll broadened hunting on U.S. Wildlife Refuges.)

Tuberculosis,  brucellosis,  & COVID-19

Zoonotic illness transmission related to hunting cattle ranches has actually not been entirely disregarded.

“Tuberculosis and brucellosis are two significant zoonoses found in farm-raised bison,  deer,  and elk,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States remembers.  “But,  due in part to a 2015 federal eradication program in cattle and captive deer,  these diseases are fairly uncommon in the United States.

“More recently farmed deer have been found to carry SARS-CoV-2 [better known as COVID-19].  Researchers found that 30% of captive and wild deer tested in Iowa in 2020 carried SARS-CoV-2,  with one herd having infection rates over 80%.

“USDA research in early 2020 showed that although deer did not show symptoms,  they can transmit the disease.  At the time of this writing,  deer,”  consisting of wild deer,  “appear to be spreading the disease back to humans.”

(See Shoving tule elk & bison aside, National Park Service prefers livestock ranchers.)

Chronic squandering illness

So-called “fence-line transmission” of persistent squandering illness,  CWD for brief,  beginning with ranched elk contaminating wild elk at hunting cattle ranches in the Rocky Mountains,  “has been reported in 29 states and is considered endemic in some,  including Colorado,  Wyoming,  and Nebraska,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States states.

“In certain areas, roughly 10% of free-roaming deer carry the disease,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States includes,  however “the CDC reports that,  on some big game ranches,  79% of deer tested positive for CWD.”

(See Hunting, regulated burns & brain rot.)

“Brucellosis at 13 times normal levels”

CWD,  a prionic illness associated to “mad cow disease” and Creutzfeldt-Jakob illness in human beings,  is not understood to have actually had human victims––yet––however hunters in CWD-endemic locations are frequently encouraged versus consuming their eliminates.

However,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States observes,  “state departments of fish and game are reliant on the sale of hunting licenses,  and by proxy,  the sale of wildlife.  These incentives may allow disease risk to be overlooked in favor of revenue,  for example,  in the case of state-run feeding grounds for elk.

“To keep population numbers high and protect hunting revenue,  Wyoming has created artificial environments of 800 or more animals per acre,  in which diseases like brucellosis are found at thirteen times normal levels.”

(See Winter policy prefers feeding elk however starving bison.)

Factory farming

Serious as the dangers related to wildlife trafficking and hunting are,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States stresses that,  “Eight of the 10 species who share the highest number of viruses with humans are domestic species, including pigs,  cattle,  sheep,  and goats.

“Ninety-eight percent of livestock in the United States live on large-scale facilities known as CAFOs (‘concentrated animal feeding operations’),  colloquially called ‘factory farms.’

“CAFOs are officially defined by the USDA  as operations that house more than 2,500 swine, 1,000 head of beef cattle (raised for meat),  700 dairy cows (raised for milk),  125,000 broiler chickens (raised for meat),  or 82,000 laying hens or pullets (raised for eggs).

“Wild aquatic birds are the natural reservoirs of avian influenzas and transmit the viruses to domestic poultry,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States once again discusses,  “who can then turn low-pathogenic strains to highly pathogenic strains,  potentially spreading them to other species.

Chickens & pigs

“Both chicken and hog facilities are particularly susceptible to viral influenza,  with hogs acting as a potential bridge species capable of passing avian influenza to humans and spawning new forms of disease.

“While recent prior outbreaks of avian influenza in humans have been rare and mostly limited to poultry workers, mortality was severe,  ranging from 30%–60%.  Estimates project an influenza A pandemic could infect 30% of the world’s population in a matter of months.”

Scared yet?

“Apart from direct transmission of pathogens,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States continues,  “overuse of antibiotics by CAFOs presents serious risks to public health.  Antibiotic drugs are fed to animals to prevent and treat illness, often caused by poor living conditions, as well as to stimulate  their growth.”

This “encourages the development of antibiotic-resistant pathogens,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States summarizes,  “such that the livestock industry not only creates zoonotic disease exposure,  but also undermines the human health system’s ability to treat some of those same diseases.”

(See Farmed animal product certifications “lack integrity,” investigators find.)

“Oversight of factory farms is limited”

Despite the magnitude of the associated risks,  “Oversight of factory farms is limited,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States continues.  “Regulators may lack basic information  about how many operations exist and where.  Surveying aerial photographs in 2017,  Iowa’s Department of Natural Resources found 4,200 previously unknown facilities in Iowa alone.

“Prior attempts by the Environmental Protection Agency to inventory and locate factory farms were abandoned following a string of lawsuits from the livestock industry.”

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States concedes that,  “Many industrial animal agricultural operations “have higher levels of biosecurity than other industries.  Access to these facilities is tightly controlled,”  but “Intense biosecurity goes hand-in-hand with a lack of transparency at these facilities that are closed to the public,  journalists, and regulators,  such that much of what is known of conditions in CAFOs comes through private undercover investigations or whistleblowers.

Strict biosecurity is not enough

“Ongoing H5N1 influenza outbreaks demonstrate that even with strict biosecurity protections in place,  and advanced warning about impending disease,  many producers are still unable to prevent infection.

“Over the last 60 years,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States  continues,  “production of both pigs and poultry has become increasingly clustered,  concentrating in regions of the Midwest and Southeast and overlapping in areas like Iowa and North Carolina.

“In these places,  each form of production makes the other more dangerous.

“Though both USDA and CDC are well versed in the risks,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States  charges,  “neither imposes any regulation to separate pig and poultry operations in order to prevent the creation of new influenza viruses.

From pigs to mink

“The interplay between different animal industries can amplify risk in other ways as well,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States adds.  “For example,  pathogens can spread as animals produced in one industry are used to feed animals in another.  In an outbreak of influenza outbreak among 15,000 mink held on a Midwestern fur farm,  researchers determined that the animals likely became infected when they were fed raw or partially-cooked turkey meat from birds who were carrying the virus.

“However,  laboratory analysis suggested that the strain the mink were infected with originated in swine—likely moving from a pig facility to infect nearby turkeys before the birds were slaughtered and fed to captive mink.”

Hiding the evidence

Speaking of mink,  “Eighteen mink farms across four states experienced outbreaks of COVID-19,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States recalls.

“The CDC waited several months after confirming that mink may have spread COVID-19 to farm workers in Michigan before releasing this information.”

(See Diseased pigs & mink gave the world COVID-19, scientists suspect.)

Meanwhile,  “Public records requests reveal that,  in the wake of COVID-19 outbreaks on Utah mink farms,  the state department of public health was denied access to the infected fur farms while attempting to carry out testing in an effort to contain the spread.

“Fur Commission USA,  the industry’s largest trade group,  issued warnings to its members not to allow reporters or researchers near their mink sheds.”

Raw milk

Almost as an aside,  tucked within a discussion of zoonotic disease risk associated with camel farming,  of which there is very little in the U.S.,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  mentions that “31 states allow for the sale of raw milk [primarily from cows and goats],  which in particular carries a greater risk of brucellosis than pasteurized milk.  Studies have shown that states that legalize raw milk sales experienced greater numbers of disease outbreaks related to milk consumption.”

(See Raw milk,  pit bulls,  exotics & chicken poop.)

Auctions,  fairs,  petting zoos

Several industries ancillary to animal agriculture are comparatively small,  but also contribute outsized zoonotic disease risk,  including livestock auctions,  fairs,  petting zoos,  and especially live markets.

Like exotic animal auctions,  livestock auctions,  fairs,  petting zoos,  and live markets bring together a variety of species under conditions which not only allow pathogens to spread,  but are conducive to reassortment of viruses and bacteria to create mutated new pathogens.

“There is often a lack of sanitation and transparency,”  at such sites,   Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States observes.  “Journalists and photographers are sometimes not allowed to document certain portions—sometimes any portions” of the events and locations.

“Additionally,  lack of record-keeping means that it may be very difficult to trace and control a disease outbreak sourced from” any of these points.

U.S. leads world in swine-origin influenza outbreaks

“Roadside petting zoos have been linked to numerous zoonotic outbreaks,  including bacterial,  viral,  and fungal infections,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States reminds.

“Fairs are almost never limited to one species of animal,  which presents additional opportunities for the spread of viruses. Perhaps the most dangerous of these combinations is poultry and swine,  as pigs are susceptible to many forms of avian influenza and provide an ideal mixing vessel for the creation of novel strains of influenza virus.

“Over the last decade,  following the 2009 H1N1 swine flu epidemic,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States says,  “the U.S. has recorded the highest number of swine-origin influenza infections of any country in the world.

“The vast majority of these infections occurred in youth swine exhibitors at state and county fairs.  Roughly 18% of swine at county fairs test positive for influenza A.9.”

Live markets

Live markets,  to be found in every major U.S. city and many small towns,  “are typically retail food markets,”  selling poultry,  mammals (predominantly rabbits,  pigs,  calves,  sheep,  and goats),  fish,  and other aquatic animals (predominantly frogs,  turtles,  and crustaceans).”

Though little noticed by most of the public,  “Hundreds of such markets operate across the United States,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States details.  “The USDA estimates that more than 25 million birds of different species pass through 130 known live bird markets in the Northeast alone each year.

“The dominant disease risk from live poultry markets is influenza. Live bird markets are particularly high-risk in this respect because they often combine waterfowl—the natural reservoirs of influenza—with chickens and other poultry who can become infected and potentially spread the  virus to other animals and humans.”

Ritual slaughter

Many live markets serve ethnic minorities,  including supplying animals for sacrificial rituals.  After reviewing the zoonotic disease dangers associated with Islamic ritual slaughter and the Caribbean practice of Santeria,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States assesses that,  “While many forms of sacrificial slaughter pose heightened  zoonotic disease risk due to a lack of biosecurity and oversight,  perhaps the most significant risk comes from the [Hassidic] Jewish practice of Kapparos (Kapparot).

“Each year in New York City alone, Kaporos practitioners sacrifice an estimated 60,000 chickens in public streets over the course of a few days before the onset of Yom Kippur.

“Practitioners are expected to directly handle the birds before and during slaughter.

“The quantity of those interactions,  as well as the resultant biofluids such as blood and excrement that can contaminate public streets,  make this form of sacrificial slaughter particularly high-risk for public health.”

(See Kaporos chicken rescue brings New York City a smile on 9-11-2021

Backyard bird keepers

Backyard bird keepers,  chiefly raising hens and secondarily raising gamefowl for cockfighting,  produce about 18.7 million birds per year,  according to USDA estimates.

“Unlike industrial poultry producers, backyard bird operations impose few if any biosecurity measures,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States reports.

“Half or more of the birds have contact with wildlife—including waterfowl, the natural reservoirs for avian influenza.

“In addition,  many owners raise multiple species of birds or other animals.  Sixteen percent of operators also raise pigs,  a species that can serve as a mixing vessel for influenza viruses and may transmit them to humans.

“Backyard poultry have also been affected by the current avian influenza outbreak, which, at the time of this writing,  has reached 507 backyard flocks along with 325 commercial suppliers, leaving a total of over 58.7 million poultry dead.”

Cockfighting

“Though animal fighting is a relatively small market,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States warns,  “it may convey significant zoonotic risk to those individuals involved in the practice because they are directly exposed to blood and other fluids.  Participants regularly handle injured animals or animal carcasses and,  without proper sanitation,  could easily become infected with any pathogens that the animal carried.

“Cockfighting operations in particular may allow for the transmission of avian influenza and other highly contagious diseases.  These concerns are augmented by a distinct lack of veterinary care and transparency.”

Mills, Davis,  & Hindi warned them

Yet,  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States continues,  “It was not until the 2002-2003 outbreak of Newcastle disease that the cockfighting industry and its movements came to be better understood by regulators.

“At the time, the industry was estimated to be worth $50 million in California alone and used a sophisticated system to transport birds illegally despite the state and federal quarantines in place.”

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States does not mention that three of the most frequent ANIMALS 24-7 contributors––Eric Mills of Action for Animals,  Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns,  and Steve Hindi of Showing Animals Respect & Kindness––have been struggling for thirty-odd years each to get indifferent public officials to enforce animal welfare laws already on the books that could prevent the disease threats associated,  respectively,  with live markets,  Kaporos,  and cockfighting.

Imports for lab use

What about animal use in biomedical research?

“Perhaps in part due to the fact that animals are often kept in isolation, and in part due to self-imposed protocols,”   Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States says,  “instances of zoonotic disease outbreaks appear quite rare in research facilities.”

But imports of monkeys from abroad for laboratory use,  in particular,  has brought new diseases into the U.S.

“For example,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States recites,  in 1989 “100 monkeys who were imported by the Hazelton Research Products facility in Reston, Virginia carried a new strain of Ebola virus,”  which infected one worker at the Kennedy Animalport in New York City and several laboratory employees.

(See Kathi Travers, 69, vehemently non-“animal rights” animal advocate.)

“Gain of function”

“Several biosecurity labs in the United States carry out research focused on infectious disease wherein animals are deliberately infected or exposed to dangerous pathogens,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States continues.  “Some of these studies have led to exposure among laboratory workers who then risk spreading these diseases to the general public.

“Perhaps the most controversial type of research study,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States notes,  “is ‘gain of function research,’”  the subject of innumerable ill-founded conspiracy theories associated with COVID-19,  “which seeks to better understand how pathogens, often animal pathogens,  could be altered and made to adapt and acquire new capacities such as becoming more virulent,  more transmissible,  or better able to infect new hosts,  often for the purposes of defending against them.”

While the conspiracy theorists typically impute that “gain of function research” is something sinister done only in Wuhan,  China,  reality is that most “gain of function research” on record has been done,  and is being done,  right here in the U.S.

“Holy cow,  Batman!”

And then there is out-and-out batshit craziness.

“Many bacterial, fungal, and viral pathogens have been identified in bat guano,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States understates.  “Bats are believed to be a reservoir for many viruses,  including SARS-related coronaviruses,”  among them COVID-19,  Nipah virus,  Ebola virus,  rabies,  the MERS coronavirus (MERS-CoV),  as well as others,  “and carry the fungus that causes histoplasmosis in humans.

“There has been at least one reported instance in China of bat-human disease transmission during the process of guano harvesting,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States says,  “in which six men fell ill with a severe respiratory disease.”

Batshit in Texas

But this is hardly just a Chinese problem.

“Bracken Cave near San Antonio, Texas supports more than 15 million Mexican free-tailed bats and is the largest bat maternal nesting colony in the world,”  Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States says.  “Purveyors harvest up to 50 tons of guano annually from Bracken cave alone.

“Similar caves are found around the United States,  including in Oklahoma,  California, Tennessee,  and Maryland.

“There are state and local guidelines as well as CDC guidelines for handling bats, but there are no known regulations in the United States governing bat guano farming.”

$773 billion for defense,  however just $468 million for pandemic readiness

The bottom line,  for Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States,  is that “More people died in one day in 2020 from COVID-19 complications than from the attacks of September 11,  2001. Yet the fiscal year 2023 defense budget released by President Joe Biden appropriated only $468 million for pandemic preparedness,  compared to $773 billion allocated for defense.”

The whole 170-page report might be downloaded from https://s18798.pcdn.co/ceap/wp-content/uploads/sites/11111/2023/07/Animal-Markets-and-Zoonotic-Disease-in-the-United-States.pdf

Animal Markets & Zoonotic Disease in the United States was investigated and composed by Ann Linder, Valerie Wilson McCarthy,  Chris Green,  Bonnie Nadzam,  Dale Jamieson,  and Kristen Stilt. It was individually examined by Kelsey Eberly,  Doug Kysar,  Carney Anne Nassar,  Jonathan Pekar, and Delcianna Winders.

Please contribute to support our work:  

Related