A Discussion with Andrew Bird

INDIE SINGER-SONGWRITER Andrew Bird just recently launched a completely Halloween-timed performance of Emily Dickinson’s “ I felt a Funeral service, in my Brain,” including the haunting and heavenly voice of Phoebe Bridgers, folk-rock artist extraordinaire. Abundant with instrumentation from celestial strings to transcendent whistling, this consistency right away brought to life a quality of secret and physical instinct I feel when checking out Dickinson’s poems. And yet, I was struck by the interaction of 2 voices, which never ever seemed like 2 different individuals however 2 layers of awareness. Due to the fact that Dickinson was specifically personal (and, naturally, we have no recording of her voice), hearing her poems aloud has actually constantly felt stunning to me. To hear this poem sung by 2 voices just increased my concerns about Dickinson’s poetry and the nature of her “expected individual,” which is how she thought about her lyric “I.”

Reverent and profane, dead and alive, definitely singular and unabashedly numerous, the speakers of Dickinson’s poems inhabit an effective, if disembodied, existence that has actually constantly appeared to enable the poems to end up being right away the inner, intimate, and inconsistent world of our– her readers’– awareness. Though enigmatically reclusive, death (the main metaphor of this poem) was an extremely genuine part of the poet’s life. Dickinson’s “flood years” of imagination overlap with the Civil War. I believe it was the poet Mark Hair who when stated that from her bed room window, which dealt with a cemetery, funeral processions were Dickinson’s truth television. Obviously, in this poem, she is not simply a witness however a personification of the funeral service.

At the same time emotional and cosmic, Andrew Bird’s “I felt a Funeral service, in my Brain” brightens the growth or birth of an imaginative part of the brain that at the same time seems like the plunge or death of another. ” I felt a Funeral service, in my Brain” acted as motivation for Bird’s brand-new album Inside Issues, so we spoke about his relationship with Dickinson, his analysis of the poem, and the method it spoke with his own inner world and innovative procedure. This discussion happened over an e-mail exchange the week the tune was launched.


ELIZABETH METZGER: Is “I felt a Funeral service, in my Brain” a poem you’ve had a relationship with for a long period of time, or was it a current discovery? Existed a considerable minute in your life when this poem came, or went back to haunt you?

ANDREW BIRD: I initially read this poem 2 to 3 years earlier as I was composing Inside Issues I was on a bike flight with a buddy who teaches a class on Emily Dickinson, and he discussed this theory that all her poems can be sung to the tune of “The Yellow Rose of Texas.” I didn’t desire this to be real, and there was an air of dismissiveness about it. I began reading her poems once again to negate this theory however got so attracted I sort of ignored “The Yellow Rose” and read with an ear towards what would make an excellent tune.

You discussed finding out about Dickinson’s modifying history, how she was sort of straitjacketed into normal poetic conventions by male editors, including her mystical punctuation, capitalization, and absence of titles. Did you feel this added to your experience or the method you saw your function in adjusting the poem to music– more doubt, more liberty, something else?

Well, speaking with this “Yellow Rose” theory now, it promises that those very first editors straightened out all her halting punctuation and abnormalities such that you might sing them all to “The Yellow Rose of Texas.” I just recently attempted “Funeral service” to this tune, and it definitely bucks at being straitjacketed as you state. Instead of having lines like “ended up, understanding, then–” as a lyrical issue, it’s those minutes that make the poem and make it worth singing.

Dickinson notoriously specifies poetry in a letter to among her regular male editor-correspondents: ” If I check out a book [and] it makes my entire body so cold no fire can ever warm me, I understand that is poetry. If I feel physically as if the top of my head were removed, I understand that is poetry. These are the only methods I understand it. Exists any other method?” Exists a specific minute in this poem that offers you that top-of-the-head sensation, or that seemed like a website for you– where accessing it, analyzing the poem, and making it yours ended up being possible? On the other hand, existed parts of the poem that felt more evasive, tough to understand, as you began to stay in them?

For me, it’s the verse that happens two times as the bridge in this tune setting: “And creak throughout my Soul/ With the very same Boots of Lead, once again.” The very first 3 verses have this relentless “treading– treading […] pounding– pounding,” then boom– it rips the top of your head open with that line. That’s why I desired the very first line of the bridge to be so dissonant, so when the significant 2nd cleaves apart to a 3rd, it seems like something is being torn apart. The next 2 verses were the most difficult to determine the phrasing, specifically “Being, however an Ear,” however Phoebe’s crystalline voice had the ability to separate the words so it didn’t seem like “boutonnière.”

I had not thought about that! In the beginning listen, a duet may appear an unexpected an option for such a singular poem– I consider the lines “And I, and Silence, some unusual Race/ Damaged, singular, here.” As quickly as I listened, I felt this was the most genius element of the tune for me, the internal stress you and Phoebe develop. I heard her voice operating as another layer of awareness, how her voice slowly gets in, joins your voice, eclipses your voice in a solo after the cosmic interlude, and after that accompanies your voice once again, prior to fading away, leaving just your voice at the end. I ‘d enjoy to hear you talk a bit about the option to have 2 voices on this track and what this indicates for the inner world of this poem, or for you in specific? How does the consistency speak with or alter the poem for you?

A lot of my tunes that end up being duets start as an internal argument, however given that it’s all internal, there’s no requirement for pronouns or casting various voices for which self is speaking. ” Funeral service” is quite plainly a monologue, so I wasn’t sure how slicing it up in between 2 voices was going to work. All I understand is I taped it solo more than a year ago for the album and didn’t believe it was strong enough. [Including] 6 verses from the very same voice was more than a tune might sustain. I keep in mind Phoebe commenting that she believed it was cool for a single monologue to be divided. I truthfully do not understand why it worked. In the beginning, Phoebe was going to simply sing consistency, however I was hoping she would sing lead.

Dickinson had numerous variations and variations of her poems (even word options marked with a little x). Due to the fact that she didn’t release lots of poems, the variations get to exist together in a remarkable method instead of the method we generally consider rough and last drafts. A few of this incomplete sensation might be why Dickinson’s poems feel so open up to analysis, or, possibly more properly, more open up to being occupied. Did you discover yourself analyzing the poem in different methods and variations, or did it sort of pertained to you in this manner from the start? Existed truths about Dickinson’s life you understood or investigated that affected your performance?

That initially variation that I provided for Inside Issues was a lot more melodic, which’s maybe another factor it didn’t work. Tune resembles a sweet mixed drink where you can’t taste the alcohol. To make the words struck more difficult and to record the droney fear of those “Boots of Lead,” I chose a two-note rotating tune. It’s just an action far from speaking sometimes.

Speaking With what we understand about Dickinson as an individual, she makes me consider specific times in my own life when what it requires to get along on the planet and have a healthy social life are at chances with this internal world and the long-lasting battle to equate and forecast it out to the world.

Among my preferred (if subtle) parts of this poem is latest thing, “then,” which to me is not a conclusive ending up however an arrow onward. The word then points both to the past and to the future, that makes the poem and therefore awareness feel strongly circular. I was really moved by the method you let the last verse direct you back to duplicate the very first verse so that you really end with “That Sense was breaking through.” Your tune leaves us with the reverse of finality, it appears. Where do you believe this poem leaves us, mentally or otherwise? What is that development of sense?

I have actually constantly fought with the expectations that tunes be cyclical instead of direct, however it makes good sense to have a refrain of “creak throughout my Soul” and to go back to “I felt a Funeral service” to make it work as a tune.

As far as where this poem leaves us, I believe she or “an expected individual” has actually collapsed and struck the bottom. It’s the falling that’s the worst, however when you are lastly empty, a type of giddiness can take hold. Maybe it’s hope? I imagine her searching for at the damaged scaffolding of her fall. I connect to this. Maybe I’m forecasting, however that’s a huge part of it.

I discussed the word singular above, however what about that other word in the line which ends up being the speaker’s buddy– silence? The dash is such a special and universal function in Dickinson’s poems. It reveals the hand on the page, marks time, provides a sense of the rhythm of believing itself. Dashes likewise enable spaces in syntax, locations for the reader to make connections and leaps. For me, they make silence a present part of speech, an invite for the reader to end up being the lyric “I” and make their own sense of the poem. How do you consider these dashes in the poem, however likewise, how did they affect your tune?

I like that “reveal the hand on the page.” When I’m composing my own tunes, I’m looking for words to fit a tune and going through many variables till the words come and suit location. When I’m setting a poem, I read it aloud and see what resonates and attempt to open the tune that’s buried therein, so it’s rather a various procedure. When it comes to the dashes, often I observe them, just like “Area–” and often I need to let it stay a strange part of the poem, just like “then–“

I have actually listened to your tune numerous times– eyes closed, eyes open, in darkness and light, in silence and with the background sound of my kids dropping meals– in each case, I have actually heard brand-new elements that subdued me. One minute where my eyes regularly bug out is the line “My mind was going numb” and how you duplicate it in the variation: “My mind was growing.” I needed to relisten often times to see if I was missing out on something or mishearing and truthfully might not keep in mind if the poem utilized the word going or growing To me, the option to include this extra variation, the juxtaposition of “going numb” and “growing,” records a lot of what this poem reveals about awareness. Can you discuss your option to repeat/vary that line?

When I’m dealing with a tune for a couple of years, it begins to wander from where it began. To be truthful, I understood that I may have sung the incorrect word there, however I liked the efficiency, so I let it lay.

Are a few of the really minimal modifications more to do with what sounds much better sung versus spoken? I observe, for instance, that you do not sing the words “kept” in lines 3 and 7, however the method you generate instrumentation appears to record the ongoingness of “kept” as does so much else about the tune.

It’s that wandering that I presume occurs for some subconscious, user-friendly factor.

Though loaded with doubt and irreverence (a minimum of as much as respect), Dickinson did pick to utilize the hymn meter of the church (iambic tetrameter, overturned with slant rhymes and adjustments where required). I discuss this since of course she was dealing with a sung rhythm to start with. Do you believe this added to how you heard the poem when you initially read it? If you’ve dealt with other texts, existed something simpler (or more difficult) that arised from the poem being composed in hymn meter?

I set 2 poems by Galway Kinnell to music several years earlier– one called “Wait,” which I needed to change considerably with the poet’s true blessing. Like I stated, Dickinson is extending the borders of that hymn type, however it definitely assists to have that type.

I can’t wait to listen. “Wait” is among my preferred poems, so loaded with seriousness. “I felt a Funeral service, in my Brain” utilizes a spiritual lexicon (” Paradises”) in addition to a clinical one (” Brain”). In other poems, she combines geometry and witchcraft or faith and the (just recently developed) microscopic lense. I saw in your video that there are pictures of cells and tiny activity in addition to X-rays. Did the poem create the spiritual for you, the clinical?

Everything assists us imagine her inner area. It resembles she went to the bottom of the ocean and has actually gone back to report what it resembles there. I like how she breaks out of the claustrophobic funeral service and enters this area and a sense of marvel dominates. This poem made me consider the parts of David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest where there’s a woman in a medical facility bed discussing what extreme anxiety seems like: like all her cells yelling at the same time, or something to that impact.

Thinking Of that on the cellular level is remarkable. When I consider the synesthesia of noise and sensation in this poem, I question how you experience music (making and listening to it). I am thinking about the expression “Being, however an Ear.” It’s that particular, capitalized Ear near Being Does the voice constantly start with the ear– how does singing connect to listening for you? Do you experience a tune entering being as physical feeling, or did you understand you were an artist since you experience or understand the world primarily through noise? Does it feel as if tunes are composing themselves in your head prior to you grab an instrument?

I have actually constantly had a visceral response to tone and texture. An icy ’80s snare drum or ’70s pedal hawaiian guitar can make me ill to my stomach. Does a tune or do the words have enough teeth to acquire traction in your mind? It’s a great line in between convenience and pain that I’m having fun with. A “nauseouselation.”

Terrific word! I consider the poet Lucie Brock-Broido (likewise really affected by Dickinson) who comprised names of locations for sensations. The “abandonarium.” For me, your cosmic crucial interlude (in between “Then Area– started to toll,” and “As all the Heavens were a Bell”) significantly records the dimensionality of area. The whistling specifically seems like it does some alchemy to my soul– breath developing into noise, time making area or area marking time. I ‘d enjoy to understand how you envisaged that middle crucial area of the tune?

I didn’t desire the words to decrease too simple with a sweet tune, however the interlude is pure tune, and I put the whistle far in the range by utilizing just the reverb chamber and not the direct mic, therefore producing depth. Those queasy lines are a fretless guitar played by Blake Mills making us seem like time is flexible.

Though a funeral service recommends a loss, I consider this poem as an expedition, even event, of the creativity. You have actually discussed how this poem talks to being deeply in your head (and the art work communicates this strongly as you stand inside a ceramic head, casting a shadow). Do you consider this tune as an expedition of your own innovative procedure? Do you feel a distinction in your brain (or awareness, body, feelings) when you are composing a tune versus when you are performing it– exists something last about the taped variation, or does the tune seem like a various experience each time you play it?

The very best tunes are plans, and whenever you sing them, there’s a lot of space to accommodate the method you feel at that minute. This tune constantly makes me feel linked and present. When I’m composing a tune, there’s the enjoyment that nobody understands yet what you have actually found, which prospective energy is powerful. When you are deep in a depressed state, you are incapable of composing poems like this, that makes me consider Emily searching for at that damaged scaffold and stating, Wow, how did I get here? It’s a dispatch from her inner world.

All I understand is, delegated their own gadgets, those spiraling ideas can leave you feeling helpless. You attempt to take deep breaths and consider some fond memory, however it’s a lightweight Band-Aid. Organizing words and tunes in my head is a bulwark versus that turmoil and stress and anxiety. I ended up being acutely mindful in the last 3 years of composing tunes as a defense. It’s why we compose.


Elizabeth Metzger is the author of Bed, chosen by Mark Bibbins for the Sunken Garden Chapbook Reward. Her very first book, The Spirit Documents, got the Juniper Reward for Poetry, and her 2nd full-length collection, Depending On, will be released in Spring 2023 by Milkweed Editions.

Leave a Reply